<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Dicevamo che Rust era più sicuro di C++?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p>Dicevamo che Rust era più sicuro di C++? Trovati 113 bug nelle utility di Ubuntu</p><p>📌 Link all'articolo : <a href="https://www.redhotcyber.com/post/dicevamo-che-rust-era-piu-sicuro-di-c-trovati-113-bug-nelle-utility-di-ubuntu/" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"><span>https://www.</span><span>redhotcyber.com/post/dicevamo-</span><span>che-rust-era-piu-sicuro-di-c-trovati-113-bug-nelle-utility-di-ubuntu/</span></a></p><p>A cura di Bajram Zeqiri</p><p><a href="https://mastodon.bida.im/tags/redhotcyber" rel="tag">#<span>redhotcyber</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.bida.im/tags/news" rel="tag">#<span>news</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.bida.im/tags/cybersecurity" rel="tag">#<span>cybersecurity</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.bida.im/tags/sicherheitainformatica" rel="tag">#<span>sicherheitainformatica</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.bida.im/tags/vulnerabilita" rel="tag">#<span>vulnerabilita</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.bida.im/tags/testdisicurezza" rel="tag">#<span>testdisicurezza</span></a> <a href="https://mastodon.bida.im/tags/ubuntu" rel="tag">#<span>ubuntu</span></a></p>]]></description><link>https://forum.pierobosio.it/topic/08ef9bef-e088-4412-ba26-ecfa7ae24010/dicevamo-che-rust-era-più-sicuro-di-c</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 13:48:05 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://forum.pierobosio.it/topic/08ef9bef-e088-4412-ba26-ecfa7ae24010.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 07:01:53 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>