Good commentary on the macro implications of AI from Nate Hagens here.

Reply to Good commentary on the macro implications of AI from Nate Hagens here. on Sun, 08 Feb 2026 14:50:18 GMT

paninid@mastodon.world — Sun, 08 Feb 2026 14:50:18 GMT

Which “AI” is being referenced?

Reply to Good commentary on the macro implications of AI from Nate Hagens here. on Sun, 02 Feb 2025 12:44:53 GMT

urlyman@mastodon.social — Sun, 02 Feb 2025 12:44:53 GMT

…In the meantime, there are tangible ways that AI is accelerating our self-terminating trajectory right now. Nate provides specifics via an oil industry contact of his, shown in this screenshot, with transcript following as post text

Reply to Good commentary on the macro implications of AI from Nate Hagens here. on Sun, 02 Feb 2025 12:31:30 GMT

urlyman@mastodon.social — Sun, 02 Feb 2025 12:31:30 GMT

…If you are a student with the world of work ahead of you, do you opt in to the AI-infused path that allows you to accrue the maximum status and advantage before that path, somewhat inevitably, jettisons you?

Or do you opt out and forego those hollow promises and submit to lower status and wealth?

Just another layer of frankly fkn awful choices for young people to have to make https://mastodon.social/@urlyman/113928583295843161

Reply to Good commentary on the macro implications of AI from Nate Hagens here. on Sun, 02 Feb 2025 12:26:11 GMT

urlyman@mastodon.social — Sun, 02 Feb 2025 12:26:11 GMT

…’Obligate technology’ describes the race that nation states with military industrial complexes feel themselves to be in.

There’s an irony that nation states and corporations are themselves kinds of AI (Stafford Beer https://mastodon.social/@urlyman/113610508240193631). So, we have nation state AIs selecting corporate AI toolsets as a defence against other adversarial AIs.

This is what UK Labour are doing.

But that also operates at the level of the individual, most acutely for young people…