Made a graph of the "wider" fediverse - is this correct?
Fediverse
2
Posts
2
Posters
0
Views
-
Been reading some docs and felt like drawing to get a better picture.
Some things to note:
- Parenthesis indicate bridges
- Fed Bridgy and Mostr appear twice because I don't know if they allow cross-communication
- One-way arrows (→) indicate one-way communication, and two-ways arrows (⇄) indicate the two sides can talk with each other
- Threads to/from Facebook and Instagram communication appears with an interrogation mark because the information I could find didn't feel conclusive and I don't have an account to test myself
- Maybe I missed some bridges and protocols, but that'd be more of a lack of knowing; also intentionally ignored X/Twitter > Nitter > RSS > ActicityPub bridges because it felt too much of a stretch.
-
Been reading some docs and felt like drawing to get a better picture.
Some things to note:
- Parenthesis indicate bridges
- Fed Bridgy and Mostr appear twice because I don't know if they allow cross-communication
- One-way arrows (→) indicate one-way communication, and two-ways arrows (⇄) indicate the two sides can talk with each other
- Threads to/from Facebook and Instagram communication appears with an interrogation mark because the information I could find didn't feel conclusive and I don't have an account to test myself
- Maybe I missed some bridges and protocols, but that'd be more of a lack of knowing; also intentionally ignored X/Twitter > Nitter > RSS > ActicityPub bridges because it felt too much of a stretch.
If you're talking protocols, then why is WordPress there?
If you include Wordpress there are about 100 other softwares that should also show up, but then you also need more paper 😁
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
If you're talking protocols, then why is WordPress there?
If you include Wordpress there are about 100 other softwares that should also show up, but then you also need more paper 😁
-
Been reading some docs and felt like drawing to get a better picture.
Some things to note:
Parenthesis indicate bridges Fed Bridgy and Mostr appear twice because I don't know if they allow cross-communication One-way arrows (→) indicate one-way communication, and two-ways arrows (⇄) indicate the two sides can talk with each other Threads to/from Facebook and Instagram communication appears with an interrogation mark because the information I could find didn't feel conclusive and I don't have an account to test myself Maybe I missed some bridges and protocols, but that'd be more of a lack of knowing; also intentionally ignored X/Twitter > Nitter > RSS > ActicityPub bridges because it felt too much of a stretch.
-
You jest, but I'm pretty sure someone out there made a cli interface for AP.
-
But your saying Peertube should have all the forum functionality of Lemmy, and the endless short video scroll of Loops.
rgluilis suggested a generic server idea, where the media and experience differentiating is done at the client app level. That could work well. But that's an entirely different cincpet and structure.
-
If I have a mutual who is on multiple platforms, and I also have accounts on those same multiple platforms, we would generally be following each other mutually on those same platforms.
-
And that's great! Everyone gets what they want. But suggesting Lemmy, Pixelfed, and Peertube, etc. should all try to do it the way Friendica does, is a bad idea.
-
So like a single ActivityPub instance that hosts all the data, but users can have a Pixelfed app, Lemmy app, etc. all connect to that one server and use it to give the experience they specifically provide.
That's a cool idea. I can see how that would work.
-
I sure do like this picture:
