@evan hey, could this get merged?
Technical Discussion
5
Posts
2
Posters
0
Views
-
@evan hey, could this get merged? https://github.com/swicg/miscellany/pull/12
It's the `as:sensitive` domain expansion to include Link objects
-
@evan hey, could this get merged? https://github.com/swicg/miscellany/pull/12
It's the `as:sensitive` domain expansion to include Link objects
-
@evan thanks!
-
System moved this topic from Uncategorized
-
@evan thanks!
@thisismissem thank *you* for doing it!
-
@thisismissem thank *you* for doing it!
@evan there's also an update on this topic here: https://github.com/swicg/activitypub-trust-and-safety/issues/97#issuecomment-3609426922
So progress is happening. I'm trying to follow up with Mastodon on their implementation of that FEP draft, and I've added it to the agenda for T&S next month, so hopefully gaining implementers after that.
I also added in how I made link previews in the Mastodon moderation tools look in 4.5, if implementers need some ideas for end-users
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
julian said in Deleting a post vs deleting an entire comment tree:
> If that object is the root-level node, and it is deleted, everything below it is also deleted.Why would everything below be deleted? Would it not simply become orphaned?
-
What if instead of doing the Announce, the requestor of the object did a like Subscribe? i.e., "I've had this object federated to me (either by user-lookup or boost from another server), you don't know I know about this object, so I'd like to inform you so that you can send me updates on this object in the future"
-
For context:
Two big threadiverse implementors (and probably mbin) currently federate Announce(Delete(Object)) for deletion of content — all synchronized communities follow suit and delete the content as well. If that object is the root-level node, and it is deleted, everything below it is also deleted. Lemmy and Piefed are investigating the possibility of changing this behaviour so that the action deletes the object itself only, and the reply tree stays.We're in the middle of discussing how best to communicate this. With Delete(Object) behaviour shifting to deleting the single object only, there are two options to delete the entire tree/thread:
Delete(Object) with a new property with_replies or similar Remove(Context), where Context is a new url that refers to the entire treeThoughts? We're discussing this tomorrow at ForumWG but it'd be nice to get some eyes on it beforehand.
cc rimu@piefed.social nutomic@lemmy.ml melroy@kbin.melroy.org bentigorlich@gehirneimer.de
-
@evan there's also an update on this topic here: https://github.com/swicg/activitypub-trust-and-safety/issues/97#issuecomment-3609426922
So progress is happening. I'm trying to follow up with Mastodon on their implementation of that FEP draft, and I've added it to the agenda for T&S next month, so hopefully gaining implementers after that.
I also added in how I made link previews in the Mastodon moderation tools look in 4.5, if implementers need some ideas for end-users
-
@thisismissem thank *you* for doing it!
-
@evan thanks!
-
@thisismissem done!
-
@evan hey, could this get merged? https://github.com/swicg/miscellany/pull/12
It's the `as:sensitive` domain expansion to include Link objects
