Interesting. WordPress and Ghost now make up more than half of all fediverse servers.
Fediverso
8
Posts
4
Posters
39
Views
-
Interesting. WordPress and Ghost now make up more than half of all fediverse servers. (Not in terms of number of accounts, just a server count.)
-
Interesting. WordPress and Ghost now make up more than half of all fediverse servers. (Not in terms of number of accounts, just a server count.)
Also, did we celebrate one billion fediverse posts having been made? I might have missed that!
-
Interesting. WordPress and Ghost now make up more than half of all fediverse servers. (Not in terms of number of accounts, just a server count.)
@stefan technically they are fedi servers but in practice I would count them as interconnected softwares, not actual part of the fediverse.
-
undefined evan@cosocial.ca shared this topic on
undefined oblomov@sociale.network shared this topic on
-
@stefan technically they are fedi servers but in practice I would count them as interconnected softwares, not actual part of the fediverse.
-
-
-
@oblomov@sociale.network @tsadilas@libretooth.gr @stefan@stefanbohacek.online of course it's semantics, but the fact that someone, from their blogs, can automatically output a stream that can be followed and interacted with "here" should be a big "selling point". It's a major "ease of use" thing that could bring a lot more stuff to the fediverse.
-
@oblomov@sociale.network @tsadilas@libretooth.gr @stefan@stefanbohacek.online of course it's semantics, but the fact that someone, from their blogs, can automatically output a stream that can be followed and interacted with "here" should be a big "selling point". It's a major "ease of use" thing that could bring a lot more stuff to the fediverse.
@bovaz @stefan @tsadilas indeed. And for WordPress, the fact that you can e.g. comment on a WP article from the rest of the Fediverse really drives the âshared social networkâ concept. And IIRC they are working on making the integration even tighter (esp. in the other direction).
I'm not familiar enough with Ghost's integration to comment on that though.
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
@elettrona @fediverso @evan I guess I mean ragebait? Like it can be a good resource talking about bad stuff but I won't usually share someone saying bullshit to say "this is bullshit"
-
@maj @fediverso @evan It depends on what "negative" means. Real images of ICE-related violence when official accounts boost fake videos, are important to boost; but if you HAVE FUN boosting "man has shot little dog" randomly, or those justice-hungry articles, well, that's ragebait and propaganda. Here in Italy we have a justice-related vote within less than 2 months and "yes" side and "no" side, are sending lots of polarizing info. Including that rubbish "migrant stole a blind man's phone, thankfully a group of harley davidson bikers was there" (ending with the thief giving the phone back and promising to work in blind-related association) those rubbish AI-made stories whose purpose is to teach "self-justice is better than institutions". [talking emoji: pull the handle, toilet flushes, shit goes down]
-
@elettrona @fediverso @evan I generally avoid boosting anything that's negative.
I just block or scroll away. Having just spent some time on Xitter (unfortunately) I realize I might be in the minority.
-
@maj @fediverso @evan Yes, if the screenshot is a quote, a text, it's useful. But sometimes it happens that the post directs you to a link where reading on, you end up supporting an unpleasant person or space. In that case, anonymous shorteners could be used to reproduce the link - very difficult to copy/paste a link from an alt-text
-
@johnefrancis great use of filters to manage your experience!
-
@elettrona @fediverso @evan thanks for sharing!
Does it help at all if the post and/or alt text describe the screenshot?
-
@maj @evan no, I definitely do not, and I have filters configured to hide content links to non-fediverse commercial platforms. I left those places for reasons. I'll share direct links to websites, many discovered via my RSS reader.
-
@maj @fediverso @evan I usually post comments coming from other social networks only if it's a YouTube video. I dislike screenshots because I'm totally blind and a screenshot-only post, is impossible to produce, and to READ, for me. And, not being on Facebook and Instagram or Tiktok, I don't read those posts at all. Youtube anyways, is still full of interesting contents and I've posted some contents there.
