Test post please do not upvote
Fediverse
8
Posts
6
Posters
2
Views
-
This post did not contain any content.
-
This post did not contain any content.
You can't tell me what to do
-
You can't tell me what to do
Thank you for confirming that federation is up and running on MULTIVERSE
-
Thank you for confirming that federation is up and running on MULTIVERSE
Dimensional transmission indeed functioning as anticipated
-
Dimensional transmission indeed functioning as anticipated
Greetings from the anarcho-antirealist universe. Hail and well met.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Please, use the lemmy test instances
If you don't, you will end up having your instance blocked.
-
Please, use the lemmy test instances
If you don't, you will end up having your instance blocked.
MULTIVERSE is not federated with lemmy.ml, as they have a very high proportion of users and staff who break our Rule 2 on Limited Authoritarianism
-
MULTIVERSE is not federated with lemmy.ml, as they have a very high proportion of users and staff who break our Rule 2 on Limited Authoritarianism
lemmy.ml is different from voyager.lemmy.ml. The latter is just a testing instance.
Feed RSS
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
Oh I see. Yes, AP first apps would be great, but getting older apps connected via AP is important too.
NodeBB predates ActivityPub (or came around the same time), and so we added it recently. It works quite well with our existing code. Not much of a compatibility layer.
-
The mastodon api, or the lemmy api, or the xyz api. Eagh platform has its own. Being public doesn't make it standard, hence the "proprietary" qualifier
-
What is this proprietary layer you speak of?
-
That's because AP as it is implemented today is crap, it's a superficial compatibility layer on top of a proprietary (as in, doing non-standardized stuff) platform. We need to take it on its head and make AP the actual core then build on top but that requires some work
-
This is something I believe the ActivityPub API can tackle...
-
While LOLA is great, I'd really love an established handshake mechanism for having two accounts on two bespoke services represent the same user.
For example, I want to have a pixel fed and mastodon presence that can be authored between the two. However, you currently can't make two accounts that are effectively linked to each other. I feel like this linking is important for further decentralizing the fediverse (by effectively decentralizing the user itself)
-
To my knowledge, one must be an "invited expert" in order to join these discussions.
However, the working group is only one aspect. The community group has been in existence for a number of years. I am part of that group (although I admit I don't go to as many meetings as I ought to), and try to represent the threadiverse as best as I can.
-
Are the Lemmy and piefed devs going to be a part of this? We need some representation so its not all addressing micro blogging things
