Request to add mods to the NodeInfo spec so we can all know how many moderators are handing content moderation on any given instance in the fediverse.
Technical Discussion
5
Posts
3
Posters
21
Views
-
Request to add
modsto the NodeInfo spec so we can all know how many moderators are handing content moderation on any given instance in the fediverse. The idea came from @jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net wanting to know the ratio of mods:users on a instance.
https://github.com/jhass/nodeinfo/issues/107
#ActivityPub #NodeInfo #ContentModeration
-
undefined julian@activitypub.space shared this topic on
-
On many platforms you can make an activitypub request to
/which returns an Application actor and would be more appropriate, IMO.Although, in the threadiverse most mods only moderate their communities, not the whole instance.
-
System shared this topic on
-
On many platforms you can make an activitypub request to
/which returns an Application actor and would be more appropriate, IMO.Although, in the threadiverse most mods only moderate their communities, not the whole instance.
@rimu @blainsmith @jwildeboer There's a potential danger in this, in that it would allow bad actors to specifically target instances which maybe don't have enough moderators, allowing undesirable behavior to go unchecked
-
@rimu @blainsmith @jwildeboer There's a potential danger in this, in that it would allow bad actors to specifically target instances which maybe don't have enough moderators, allowing undesirable behavior to go unchecked
@thisismissem@hachyderm.io
Good call out! This could either kill the idea or one possibility would be to make this opt-in, but @rimu@piefed.social does raise a point about moderating communities with instances.
@jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net
-
@thisismissem@hachyderm.io
Good call out! This could either kill the idea or one possibility would be to make this opt-in, but @rimu@piefed.social does raise a point about moderating communities with instances.
@jwildeboer@social.wildeboer.net@blainsmith @rimu @jwildeboer there is a forthcoming FEP from the AP T&S taskforce that introduces the idea of a Moderation Actor for Actors, so like "Moderated By", which would be a Group or Service actor probably, but it would not be required to disclose it's members.
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
imo social media and social networking are different things. mastodon is the former and doesn't need privacy. it's public and about going viral. encryption is needed for the latter. direct messaging and groups. #ActivityPub vs #matrix.
-
I use Mastodon DMs.
I want encryption, but there is something higher priority for me —
Being able to see ALL the DMs for a single user (that I have talked to) in a single place. Rather than having them scattered all over the place.
I get that these scattered DMs are the result of separate conversational threads, but — I would still like to see them all (from a single user) in one place.
-
RE: https://mastodon.social/@reiver/112133984854710390
"A guide to implement ActivityPub in a static site (or any website)" by @mapache
https://maho.dev/2024/02/a-guide-to-implement-activitypub-in-a-static-site-or-any-website/
-
Might bee a bug, I need to touch things regarding that
-
-
@julian @mario Yes, it supports both Add and Announce. However, wrapped activities are simply added to a conversation, there is no concept of "group" yet.
-
Is this what Mitra does now for 171b/1b12 cross-compatibility?
