Skip to content

Piero Bosio Social Web Site Personale Logo Fediverso

Social Forum federato con il resto del mondo. Non contano le istanze, contano le persone
  1. Home
  2. Categories
  3. Fediverso
  4. I've gone live!

I've gone live!

Fediverso
1 1 1
Log in to reply

Feed RSS
I've gone live!

Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
@pierobosio@soc.bosio.info
Post suggeriti
  • Kent Navalesi ☕️undefined

    #FediTips

    General Discussion feditips mastodon activitypub fediverse feditip
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    0 Views
    Kent Navalesi ☕️undefined
    #FediTips Don't forget to check https://about.fedigroups.social/directory periodically for new groups to follow. Since gup.pe went down, the groups ecosystem has had to be rebuilt, so new ones are being added all the time.#mastodon #activitypub #fediverse #feditip
  • Davy Jonesundefined

    Script idea to discover underappreciated Lemmy instances

    Fediverso fediverse
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    9 Views
    Davy Jonesundefined
    I’ve been thinking about discovering underappreciated Lemmy instances. GitHub’s awesome-lemmy-instances used to serve a similar purpose, but it hasn’t been updated in a long time, and I haven’t found anything else like it. I got the idea from this post about finding decentralized communities in the Fediverse. I’m thinking of a Lemmy bot that tracks Lemmy instances, calculates the average number of active users and standard deviation, and identifies instances with activity below the average plus two standard deviations. It would then rank these underutilized instances by performance metrics like uptime and response time, and periodically update a curated list on Lemmy to guide users toward instances that could use more participation. I'd love feedback on how you would go about doing something like this. And specifically how to rank by performance.
  • Todd Sundstedundefined

    Release v2.4.15 of Ktistec

    Fediverso ktistec fediverse activitypub crystallang
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    3 Views
    Todd Sundstedundefined
    Experimental support for multiple users landed with Ktistec release v2.4.15. "Experimental" means that it works for me, but hasn't seen enough testing for me to call it "ready for production". With that said, it's unlikely you'll lose your data.There are lots of intentional design decisions that fit my vision for Ktistec but may surprise you. Here they are:Every user is an administrator. That doesn't mean users have access to each other's posts and data, but it does mean all users have access to the shared parts of the site—they can change the site description, for example—and they can add new users. So only add people you trust.If you want to add another user, create an account for them and give them their username and password.  There is no self-registration. There are no invitations.Beyond adding a user, there is no support for user management. You can't even boot a user from your site. Users can delete themselves, however.There is no support for content moderation. Only add people you trust.TL;DR Multi-user support in Ktistec is suitable for small teams, families (biological or chosen), and your personal avatars. There are better tools for online communities.Here's the full set of changes:AddedAdd support for multiple user accounts.FixedHide attachments behind the summary. (fixes #125)Mark actors as up after refreshing their profile.#ktistec #fediverse #activitypub #crystallang
  • Otterundefined

    Did something change recently with how Mastodon displays content from Lemmy / the threadiverse?

    Fediverso fediverse
    12
    0 Votes
    12 Posts
    21 Views
    julianundefined
    I suppose, although in that scenario theoretically one could add as:sensitive to mark the status as CW'd? I don't think CW logic is even run for non-Notes at the moment, though I could be mistaken.