Salta al contenuto
0
  • Home
  • Piero Bosio
  • Blog
  • Mondo
  • Fediverso
  • News
  • Categorie
  • Old Web Site
  • Recenti
  • Popolare
  • Tag
  • Utenti
  • Home
  • Piero Bosio
  • Blog
  • Mondo
  • Fediverso
  • News
  • Categorie
  • Old Web Site
  • Recenti
  • Popolare
  • Tag
  • Utenti
Skin
  • Chiaro
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Scuro
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Predefinito (Cerulean)
  • Nessuna skin
Collassa

Piero Bosio Social Web Site Personale Logo Fediverso

Social Forum federato con il resto del mondo. Non contano le istanze, contano le persone
  1. Home
  2. Categorie
  3. Fediverso
  4. I would like to give an update on "federation" on Bluesky

I would like to give an update on "federation" on Bluesky

Pianificato Fissato Bloccato Spostato Fediverso
331 Post 107 Autori 3.0k Visualizzazioni
  • Da Vecchi a Nuovi
  • Da Nuovi a Vecchi
  • Più Voti
Rispondi
  • Risposta alla discussione
Effettua l'accesso per rispondere
Questa discussione è stata eliminata. Solo gli utenti con diritti di gestione possono vederla.
  • mcc@mastodon.socialundefined mcc@mastodon.social

    If you sign up with https://blacksky.community you get:

    - Blacksky's "appview"/web frontend
    - Optionally, Blacksky's PDS
    - Blacksky's moderation layer (and you can optionally enable Bluesky's too)

    Almost-complete independence! What I'm not clear on is to whether, or to what degree Blacksky relies on Bluesky's "relay":

    swetland@chaos.socialundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
    swetland@chaos.socialundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
    swetland@chaos.social
    scritto su ultima modifica di
    #21

    @mcc Oh that is interesting. If they are (or are soon to be) operating their own relay, things are definitely further along than I thought as far as actual bsky federation (instead of just handwaving the bsky team does whenever anyone grumbles about their screwy moderation policies or whatnot) goes.

    1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
    0
    • mcc@mastodon.socialundefined mcc@mastodon.social

      No. Because "Gertrude", in our hypothetical, *won't bother making those posts*. Because the vast, incredible, overwhelming majority of Bluesky users are still on the Bluesky network, and she is excommunicated. She *could* cultivate a group of followers who all use the Northsky infrastructure just so they can see her posts. But she could also cultivate a following on her Patreon. So Hypothetical Gertrude ignores Bluesky, posts to Patreon, and her Patreon posts get *shared* to Bluesky. (3/3)

      lritter@mastodon.gamedev.placeundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
      lritter@mastodon.gamedev.placeundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
      lritter@mastodon.gamedev.place
      scritto su ultima modifica di
      #22

      @mcc technically mastodon dot social could grow big enough to also become this kind of dickface. but i'm talking hypothetical, you're talking reality. with more fragmentation, bsky would become stronger as a network. this is a message we can push on bsky central itself.

      mcc@mastodon.socialundefined 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
      0
      • mcc@mastodon.socialundefined mcc@mastodon.social

        @gbargoud Sure. You could do that. I'm aware of a patch to the PDS (backend) software that allows it to flat out publish via ActivityPub. I haven't seen a *frontend* that merges the streams yet though.

        There's also the problem that you can't reeeallly monitor *just part* of the Bluesky network. To follow part of it you're supposed to drink the entire firehose and filter out the parts you care about.

        swetland@chaos.socialundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
        swetland@chaos.socialundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
        swetland@chaos.social
        scritto su ultima modifica di
        #23

        @mcc @gbargoud It would seem like maybe this could be mitigated a bit by a (hosted) service that operates a filtered relay feed -- which drinks from the full network firehose, but lets downstream users small instances/servers subscribe to a subset view of that (based on accounts/hashtags/filters to observe).

        msh@coales.coundefined 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
        0
        • groupnebula563@mastodon.socialundefined groupnebula563@mastodon.social

          @mcc it really is a shame that there was all that racism happening. I've been seeing less and less of it, and hopefully it gets taken care of altogether soon so everyone (except bigots, they can fuck right off) feels welcome on fedi

          jef@mastodon.socialundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
          jef@mastodon.socialundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
          jef@mastodon.social
          scritto su ultima modifica di
          #24

          @GroupNebula563 @mcc Would be nice! Won't happen though.

          groupnebula563@mastodon.socialundefined 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
          0
          • mcc@mastodon.socialundefined mcc@mastodon.social

            I would like to give an update on "federation" on Bluesky.

            My expectation was it was unlikely we'd ever see this happen because "federation" on ATProto means basically reproducing the entirety of the Bluesky software stack. In old Big Data terms, on ActivityPub your instance is a "horizontal shard" of the network; ATProto forces full DB replicas only.

            Still, we're seeing movement on this front, which I'd split into two categories:

            1. Your fault (you reading this)
            2. Aaron Rodericks's fault

            txtechnician@mastodon.socialundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
            txtechnician@mastodon.socialundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
            txtechnician@mastodon.social
            scritto su ultima modifica di
            #25

            @mcc Bluesky is a venture capital shit show in the making. The rug pull will happen in the next decade.

            I did not know about the fighting between black devs and the queer community.??? What is the lore there.

            Cuz it sux that they went the way of atproto over activity pub.

            benroyce@mastodon.socialundefined 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
            0
            • lritter@mastodon.gamedev.placeundefined lritter@mastodon.gamedev.place

              @mcc technically mastodon dot social could grow big enough to also become this kind of dickface. but i'm talking hypothetical, you're talking reality. with more fragmentation, bsky would become stronger as a network. this is a message we can push on bsky central itself.

              mcc@mastodon.socialundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
              mcc@mastodon.socialundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
              mcc@mastodon.social
              scritto su ultima modifica di
              #26

              @lritter I think this happening with m.s is a real risk, but the thing I'd point to to say it hasn't happened in practice is that m.s is probably the most blocked instance and none of the instances blocking m.s seem unhappy!

              1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
              0
              • julian@activitypub.spaceundefined julian@activitypub.space ha condiviso questa discussione su
              • mcc@mastodon.socialundefined mcc@mastodon.social

                If you sign up with https://blacksky.community you get:

                - Blacksky's "appview"/web frontend
                - Optionally, Blacksky's PDS
                - Blacksky's moderation layer (and you can optionally enable Bluesky's too)

                Almost-complete independence! What I'm not clear on is to whether, or to what degree Blacksky relies on Bluesky's "relay":

                jdp23@neuromatch.socialundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                jdp23@neuromatch.socialundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                jdp23@neuromatch.social
                scritto su ultima modifica di
                #27

                @mcc Right now, its only Blacksky's feeds and moderation service that are using their own relay.

                They're not currently running their own AppView (although a lot of people are confused about this -- I even saw Masnick get it wrong) . They're working on this and saying it should be out fairly soon, at which point I believe the plan is to have blacksky.community switch over (or maybe offer the choice of which AppView to use, the way deer.social currently does). I assume their AppView will use their own Relay but haven't verified this.

                Another current dependency is on Bluesky's platform-level moderation, the automatied scanning for CSAM, malware, and spam. At the technical level it's easily replaceable -- Bluesky outsources it -- but it's not cheap (especially since video is supported); Rudy estimated $160,000/year.

                mcc@mastodon.socialundefined nlupo@amikejo.xyzundefined 2 Risposte Ultima Risposta
                0
                • jrose@social.belkadan.comundefined jrose@social.belkadan.com

                  @mcc For my own understanding: while the server architecture is different, the same thing could happen on the Fediverse, right? (Except portability is worse.) The only thing saving it is that mastodon.social is only the plurality of users, maybe a majority, but not the overwhelming majority?

                  mcc@mastodon.socialundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                  mcc@mastodon.socialundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                  mcc@mastodon.social
                  scritto su ultima modifica di
                  #28

                  @jrose I mean, observably, a *lot* of servers are outright blocking mastodon.social and the users seem entirely happy.

                  The question is whether a non mothership community can be viable without the mothership. That's the case on Mastodon. Bluesky isn't close and we're only now starting to see *movement toward* it getting close. The difference between 51% and 99.9% is meaningful.

                  megmac@social.treehouse.systemsundefined 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
                  0
                  • alter_kaker@hachyderm.ioundefined alter_kaker@hachyderm.io

                    @mcc I'm curious, but I haven't had any time to look into this, so if you know off the top of your head, cost aside, how much work/knowledge does it take to stand up the whole stack at this point? Does Blacksky, for example, or Northsky, have their software available and documented? I think that it would be fun to try to try, but I have limited time and this isn't really my specialization.

                    mcc@mastodon.socialundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                    mcc@mastodon.socialundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                    mcc@mastodon.social
                    scritto su ultima modifica di
                    #29

                    @alter_kaker I'm not the person to ask. I would join the Bluesky API Touchers discord (yes, it's really named that) and ask there.

                    Blacksky has all their software on GitHub (they are using a mix of original Bluesky software and their own stuff) but not instructions on how to deploy it as a whole stack.

                    mat@friendica.exon.nameundefined 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
                    0
                    • jdp23@neuromatch.socialundefined jdp23@neuromatch.social

                      @mcc Right now, its only Blacksky's feeds and moderation service that are using their own relay.

                      They're not currently running their own AppView (although a lot of people are confused about this -- I even saw Masnick get it wrong) . They're working on this and saying it should be out fairly soon, at which point I believe the plan is to have blacksky.community switch over (or maybe offer the choice of which AppView to use, the way deer.social currently does). I assume their AppView will use their own Relay but haven't verified this.

                      Another current dependency is on Bluesky's platform-level moderation, the automatied scanning for CSAM, malware, and spam. At the technical level it's easily replaceable -- Bluesky outsources it -- but it's not cheap (especially since video is supported); Rudy estimated $160,000/year.

                      mcc@mastodon.socialundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                      mcc@mastodon.socialundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                      mcc@mastodon.social
                      scritto su ultima modifica di
                      #30

                      @jdp23 "They're not even running their own appview"

                      I don't understand. What is the website I have been using to access bluesky for the last month, then?

                      jdp23@neuromatch.socialundefined 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
                      0
                      • mcc@mastodon.socialundefined mcc@mastodon.social

                        And that's why I say, TLDR:

                        - I am legitimately excited about the work being done by Blacksky Algorithms! I am using their frontend and happy with it.

                        - Northsky is an interesting development to watch

                        - If you're on a Bluesky PDS, I recommend migrating off with one of these tools https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:ii5jchdzlmcojjw4dqczcgkh/post/3lyt6t6qfa22u

                        - Everything Sucks. A LOT of things would have to change at a social level for *any* entity other than Bluesky to have power or independence in the ATP ecosystem. I still don't trust Bluesky.

                        aeva@mastodon.gamedev.placeundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                        aeva@mastodon.gamedev.placeundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                        aeva@mastodon.gamedev.place
                        scritto su ultima modifica di
                        #31

                        @mcc do you think this work (on Blacksky or northsky's part) will lead to more independent atproto towers showing up in the future?

                        mcc@mastodon.socialundefined 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
                        0
                        • mcc@mastodon.socialundefined mcc@mastodon.social

                          @jdp23 "They're not even running their own appview"

                          I don't understand. What is the website I have been using to access bluesky for the last month, then?

                          jdp23@neuromatch.socialundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                          jdp23@neuromatch.socialundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                          jdp23@neuromatch.social
                          scritto su ultima modifica di
                          #32

                          @mcc it's a client (aka app) that uses an appview -- currently the Bluesky appview

                          mcc@mastodon.socialundefined 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
                          0
                          • aeva@mastodon.gamedev.placeundefined aeva@mastodon.gamedev.place

                            @mcc do you think this work (on Blacksky or northsky's part) will lead to more independent atproto towers showing up in the future?

                            mcc@mastodon.socialundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                            mcc@mastodon.socialundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                            mcc@mastodon.social
                            scritto su ultima modifica di
                            #33

                            @aeva "Tower", that's a good word for it.

                            I think observably, the fact blacksky exists as a full stack (or at least end to end) example *is* inspiring more towers to stand up, and I'd put northsky as the example. (Or so I assume, I don't know for a fact the order of events.)

                            mcc@mastodon.socialundefined 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
                            0
                            • mcc@mastodon.socialundefined mcc@mastodon.social

                              @aeva "Tower", that's a good word for it.

                              I think observably, the fact blacksky exists as a full stack (or at least end to end) example *is* inspiring more towers to stand up, and I'd put northsky as the example. (Or so I assume, I don't know for a fact the order of events.)

                              mcc@mastodon.socialundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                              mcc@mastodon.socialundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                              mcc@mastodon.social
                              scritto su ultima modifica di
                              #34

                              @aeva The question as always with ATP though is "why?". That is *why* would anyone bother splitting from bluesky. What we've seen so far is two demographic communities with reasons to distrust platforms they don't operate themselves.

                              So like who else would bother? You wouldn't see like, a fishing community standing up their own tower because they have no reason to expect Bluesky will target them specifically, and it costs so much more than running a Mastodon instance.

                              cthos@mastodon.cthos.devundefined swetland@chaos.socialundefined jdp23@neuromatch.socialundefined 3 Risposte Ultima Risposta
                              0
                              • jdp23@neuromatch.socialundefined jdp23@neuromatch.social

                                @mcc it's a client (aka app) that uses an appview -- currently the Bluesky appview

                                mcc@mastodon.socialundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                                mcc@mastodon.socialundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                                mcc@mastodon.social
                                scritto su ultima modifica di
                                #35

                                @jdp23 oh dear.

                                jdp23@neuromatch.socialundefined 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
                                0
                                • mcc@mastodon.socialundefined mcc@mastodon.social

                                  @jrose I mean, observably, a *lot* of servers are outright blocking mastodon.social and the users seem entirely happy.

                                  The question is whether a non mothership community can be viable without the mothership. That's the case on Mastodon. Bluesky isn't close and we're only now starting to see *movement toward* it getting close. The difference between 51% and 99.9% is meaningful.

                                  megmac@social.treehouse.systemsundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                                  megmac@social.treehouse.systemsundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                                  megmac@social.treehouse.systems
                                  scritto su ultima modifica di
                                  #36

                                  @mcc @jrose and I'm pretty sure m.s isn't even close to 51% anyways, whether in terms of total accounts or active accounts. I think it's more like 30%ish eyeballing fedidb.com's stats.

                                  There are over 30k distinct activitypub servers out there, all with their own moderation policies, for better or worse.

                                  mcc@mastodon.socialundefined 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
                                  0
                                  • megmac@social.treehouse.systemsundefined megmac@social.treehouse.systems

                                    @mcc @jrose and I'm pretty sure m.s isn't even close to 51% anyways, whether in terms of total accounts or active accounts. I think it's more like 30%ish eyeballing fedidb.com's stats.

                                    There are over 30k distinct activitypub servers out there, all with their own moderation policies, for better or worse.

                                    mcc@mastodon.socialundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                                    mcc@mastodon.socialundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                                    mcc@mastodon.social
                                    scritto su ultima modifica di
                                    #37

                                    @megmac @jrose I think the interesting question to me is whether the mastodon ggmbh "market share" of the fediverse is going up or down over time. If they're at 30% now that sounds like they're trending down.

                                    megmac@social.treehouse.systemsundefined 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
                                    0
                                    • mcc@mastodon.socialundefined mcc@mastodon.social

                                      @aeva The question as always with ATP though is "why?". That is *why* would anyone bother splitting from bluesky. What we've seen so far is two demographic communities with reasons to distrust platforms they don't operate themselves.

                                      So like who else would bother? You wouldn't see like, a fishing community standing up their own tower because they have no reason to expect Bluesky will target them specifically, and it costs so much more than running a Mastodon instance.

                                      cthos@mastodon.cthos.devundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                                      cthos@mastodon.cthos.devundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                                      cthos@mastodon.cthos.dev
                                      scritto su ultima modifica di
                                      #38

                                      @mcc @aeva Is there a good breakdown of the overall costs? Like I saw a lightweight AppView implementation still has to store roughly 2 gb of data per day, indefinitely, and...that's a _lot_ of storage.

                                      I assume there's also a fair amount of bandwidth and other cost involved.

                                      mcc@mastodon.socialundefined 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
                                      0
                                      • alter_kaker@hachyderm.ioundefined alter_kaker@hachyderm.io

                                        @mcc I'm curious, but I haven't had any time to look into this, so if you know off the top of your head, cost aside, how much work/knowledge does it take to stand up the whole stack at this point? Does Blacksky, for example, or Northsky, have their software available and documented? I think that it would be fun to try to try, but I have limited time and this isn't really my specialization.

                                        esoteric_programmer@social.stealthy.clubundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                                        esoteric_programmer@social.stealthy.clubundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                                        esoteric_programmer@social.stealthy.club
                                        scritto su ultima modifica di
                                        #39

                                        @alter_kaker @mcc hmm, apparently not that much knowledge is required, and the cost dropped significantly, I still don't trust any of it though

                                        https://whtwnd.com/bnewbold.net/3lo7a2a4qxg2l

                                        alter_kaker@hachyderm.ioundefined lrhodes@merveilles.townundefined ikuturso@mastodon.socialundefined 3 Risposte Ultima Risposta
                                        0
                                        • mcc@mastodon.socialundefined mcc@mastodon.social

                                          @megmac @jrose I think the interesting question to me is whether the mastodon ggmbh "market share" of the fediverse is going up or down over time. If they're at 30% now that sounds like they're trending down.

                                          megmac@social.treehouse.systemsundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                                          megmac@social.treehouse.systemsundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                                          megmac@social.treehouse.systems
                                          scritto su ultima modifica di
                                          #40

                                          @mcc @jrose I suspect their share goes up when there's a mass migration event and goes down otherwise, because in a mass migration event people want the easy answer and that's the easy answer the Mastodon website gives them. But otherwise there's probably a lot of accounts on m.s that don't stick around, while people on other instances might be more sticky (at least unless their instance shuts down).

                                          It's been a while since one of those migrations came here so I think overall that's probably correct.

                                          mcc@mastodon.socialundefined ikuturso@mastodon.socialundefined 2 Risposte Ultima Risposta
                                          0

                                          Ciao! Sembra che tu sia interessato a questa conversazione, ma non hai ancora un account.

                                          Stanco di dover scorrere gli stessi post a ogni visita? Quando registri un account, tornerai sempre esattamente dove eri rimasto e potrai scegliere di essere avvisato delle nuove risposte (tramite email o notifica push). Potrai anche salvare segnalibri e votare i post per mostrare il tuo apprezzamento agli altri membri della comunità.

                                          Con il tuo contributo, questo post potrebbe essere ancora migliore 💗

                                          Registrati Accedi
                                          Rispondi
                                          • Risposta alla discussione
                                          Effettua l'accesso per rispondere
                                          • Da Vecchi a Nuovi
                                          • Da Nuovi a Vecchi
                                          • Più Voti


                                          • 1
                                          • 2
                                          • 3
                                          • 4
                                          • 5
                                          • 16
                                          • 17
                                          Feed RSS
                                          I would like to give an update on "federation" on Bluesky
                                          @pierobosio@soc.bosio.info
                                          V4.10.1 Contributors
                                          • Accedi

                                          • Accedi o registrati per effettuare la ricerca.
                                          • Primo post
                                            Ultimo post