Salta al contenuto
0
  • Home
  • Piero Bosio
  • Blog
  • Mondo
  • Fediverso
  • News
  • Categorie
  • Old Web Site
  • Recenti
  • Popolare
  • Tag
  • Utenti
  • Home
  • Piero Bosio
  • Blog
  • Mondo
  • Fediverso
  • News
  • Categorie
  • Old Web Site
  • Recenti
  • Popolare
  • Tag
  • Utenti
Skin
  • Chiaro
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Scuro
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Predefinito (Cerulean)
  • Nessuna skin
Collassa

Piero Bosio Social Web Site Personale Logo Fediverso

Social Forum federato con il resto del mondo. Non contano le istanze, contano le persone
  1. Home
  2. Categorie
  3. Fediverse
  4. The politics of decentralization and the libertarian allure of the fediverse

The politics of decentralization and the libertarian allure of the fediverse

Pianificato Fissato Bloccato Spostato Fediverse
fediversemastodon
1 Post multipli 29 Post 15 Autori 3 Visualizzazioni
  • Da Vecchi a Nuovi
  • Da Nuovi a Vecchi
  • Più Voti
Rispondi
  • Risposta alla discussione
Effettua l'accesso per rispondere
Questa discussione è stata eliminata. Solo gli utenti con diritti di gestione possono vederla.
  • misk@piefed.socialundefined misk@piefed.social

    I would imagine that in this hypothetical scenario furries would be able to move to a new instance and keep reading their own posts without further interruption. If they wouldn’t move then they weren’t a community and just a bunch of random people. Then again I’m a person to build a vampire castle and keep posting into the void because too much popularity is annoying.

    bearboiblake@pawb.socialundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
    bearboiblake@pawb.socialundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
    bearboiblake@pawb.social
    scritto su ultima modifica di
    #21

    Sure, the furries can do that, but that just creates essentially segregated communities, and there are far fewer furries than non-furries. It really feels like you just want to pretend this isn't a problem, but I'm not sure why

    misk@piefed.socialundefined 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
    0
    • bearboiblake@pawb.socialundefined bearboiblake@pawb.social

      Sure, the furries can do that, but that just creates essentially segregated communities, and there are far fewer furries than non-furries. It really feels like you just want to pretend this isn't a problem, but I'm not sure why

      misk@piefed.socialundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
      misk@piefed.socialundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
      misk@piefed.social
      scritto su ultima modifica di
      #22

      I understand now that this is probably not a hypothetical scenario but I still believe that no instance owner owes a service to anyone. Thankfully we’re using a communication protocol that allows us to continue talking even if LW banned our accounts right now.

      bearboiblake@pawb.socialundefined 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
      0
      • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.comundefined sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com

        This is somewhere between 'not a very compelling argument' to 'oh ok I guess left-anarchism doesn't exist'.

        The whole thing is essentially ideology by, and as, analogy.

        Cool!

        Wanna try any empiricism?

        Not an erudite vibes based argument?

        Imagine Mastodon had a governance system where all users, admins and minorities were equally represented.

        Nah, I'd rather try to imagine a goverance system where users and admins either don't exist as seperate categories, or are as close to indistinguishable as possible.

        This person defines progress as managed, fair, hierachy.

        ... howabout abolishing class, to the greatest extent possible?

        But according to this person, my backlash to this is rooted in ... property rights.

        Got it.

        Turbolib can't imagine any ideology other than their own, also grass is green.

        Maybe they could come by the goverance comms of dbzer0 and the rest of the flotilla, for some exposure to some other ideas?

        magnificentsteiner@lemmy.zipundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
        magnificentsteiner@lemmy.zipundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
        magnificentsteiner@lemmy.zip
        scritto su ultima modifica di
        #23

        Yep, first thought that popped into my head after reading it was that it had big "freedom for me but not for thee" vibes. But of course their "freedom for me but not for thee" is better for everyone than the other kinds.

        sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.comundefined 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
        0
        • misk@piefed.socialundefined misk@piefed.social

          I understand now that this is probably not a hypothetical scenario but I still believe that no instance owner owes a service to anyone. Thankfully we’re using a communication protocol that allows us to continue talking even if LW banned our accounts right now.

          bearboiblake@pawb.socialundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
          bearboiblake@pawb.socialundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
          bearboiblake@pawb.social
          scritto su ultima modifica di
          #24

          I'm not arguing that instance operators must be compelled to host communities or users they don't want to - just that the centralization of communities is a big issue for free speech and expression. I'm saying that we should acknowledge the problem and work to mitigate it.

          misk@piefed.socialundefined 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
          0
          • magnificentsteiner@lemmy.zipundefined magnificentsteiner@lemmy.zip

            Yep, first thought that popped into my head after reading it was that it had big "freedom for me but not for thee" vibes. But of course their "freedom for me but not for thee" is better for everyone than the other kinds.

            sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.comundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
            sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.comundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
            sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            scritto su ultima modifica di
            #25

            Not only is it better, its the only possible option.

            Other options literally do not exist, you can't see them at all through the frame job of this Overton window, drapes are done up in Hayek, and if you don't like the drapes, you're an anarcho capitalist.

            magnificentsteiner@lemmy.zipundefined 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
            0
            • bearboiblake@pawb.socialundefined bearboiblake@pawb.social

              I'm not arguing that instance operators must be compelled to host communities or users they don't want to - just that the centralization of communities is a big issue for free speech and expression. I'm saying that we should acknowledge the problem and work to mitigate it.

              misk@piefed.socialundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
              misk@piefed.socialundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
              misk@piefed.social
              scritto su ultima modifica di
              #26

              Agreed.

              Interestingly enough this is something that later Dune novels touch on a lot.

              ::: spoiler God Emperor of Dune spoilers
              Leto II had to put humanity through millennia of abuse for it to learn that dispersing is the best form of resisting tyranny.
              :::

              I feel that we don’t have necessary tools to change nature of humanity but I’m happy we have Fediverse.

              1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
              0
              • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.comundefined sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com

                Not only is it better, its the only possible option.

                Other options literally do not exist, you can't see them at all through the frame job of this Overton window, drapes are done up in Hayek, and if you don't like the drapes, you're an anarcho capitalist.

                magnificentsteiner@lemmy.zipundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                magnificentsteiner@lemmy.zipundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                magnificentsteiner@lemmy.zip
                scritto su ultima modifica di
                #27

                lmao yeah xD

                1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
                0
                • bearboiblake@pawb.socialundefined bearboiblake@pawb.social

                  This is something that has been on my mind as well - centralized platforms such as Reddit et al. are functionally monarchies, but the Fediverse is functionally feudal... which, y'know, isn't great... the thing is, I'm not sure how we can solve this problem, and I've thought about it quite a bit over the years.

                  The root of the issue is that there is no way to preserve privacy and also ensure that every user is a real human and not a bot/sockpuppet or whatever, so any forms of democracy are dead on arrival on the Internet. The only thing I can really think of would be a real-world fully mutual co-operative that requires in-person voting to decide on issues, but obviously that would mean that instances would need to be tied to a real-world location. I suppose live video calls might be possible, but idk... with modern AI deepfakes, even that might be prone to manipulation by malicious actors.

                  Until we've got a solution to that problem, I think federated feudal states is about the best we can do, and it's a vast improvement over the monarchic alternative.

                  tuuktuuk@piipitin.fiundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                  tuuktuuk@piipitin.fiundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                  tuuktuuk@piipitin.fi
                  scritto su ultima modifica di
                  #28

                  @bearboiblake @rimu

                  One important difference to feudalism is that you can really easily move your homestead to another lord's domain.

                  I'd say that does solve a lot. Making instance-switching more fluent, and then yet more fluent, would be enough in my eyes.

                  bearboiblake@pawb.socialundefined 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
                  0
                  • tuuktuuk@piipitin.fiundefined tuuktuuk@piipitin.fi

                    @bearboiblake @rimu

                    One important difference to feudalism is that you can really easily move your homestead to another lord's domain.

                    I'd say that does solve a lot. Making instance-switching more fluent, and then yet more fluent, would be enough in my eyes.

                    bearboiblake@pawb.socialundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                    bearboiblake@pawb.socialundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                    bearboiblake@pawb.social
                    scritto su ultima modifica di
                    #29

                    Peasants could move between fiefs, but fiefs couldn't easily move, except by gathering everyone up, and packing everything they can into a caravan, and taking a perilous journey to new lands. Users are peasants, communities are fiefs.

                    1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
                    0

                    Ciao! Sembra che tu sia interessato a questa conversazione, ma non hai ancora un account.

                    Stanco di dover scorrere gli stessi post a ogni visita? Quando registri un account, tornerai sempre esattamente dove eri rimasto e potrai scegliere di essere avvisato delle nuove risposte (tramite email o notifica push). Potrai anche salvare segnalibri e votare i post per mostrare il tuo apprezzamento agli altri membri della comunità.

                    Con il tuo contributo, questo post potrebbe essere ancora migliore 💗

                    Registrati Accedi
                    Rispondi
                    • Risposta alla discussione
                    Effettua l'accesso per rispondere
                    • Da Vecchi a Nuovi
                    • Da Nuovi a Vecchi
                    • Più Voti


                    • 1
                    • 2
                    Feed RSS
                    The politics of decentralization and the libertarian allure of the fediverse
                    @pierobosio@soc.bosio.info
                    V4.10.1 Contributors
                    • Accedi

                    • Accedi o registrati per effettuare la ricerca.
                    • Primo post
                      Ultimo post