@hannah@moonserver.yorha.nexus @Foxboron@chaos.social well, it would be public domain (by current rulings in the US) if the newer version is sufficiently different from the original LGPL to not be covered under that copyright
Very "funny" to license a repo as MIT when it is potentially either LGPL or public domain
Brie (robot girl)
@brie@do.crimes.brie.gay
Posts
-
Apparently chardet got Claude to rewrite the entire codebase from LGPL to MIT?