@mcc "This is why I believe Bluesky was never meant to be federated."
100%. Bluesky was developed as a project within twitter when it was still twitter, under Jack Dorsey, with the threat of a buyout from Musk or other parties looming. It was fully intended to replace twitter's infrastructure, but couldn't be done since the buyout happened too quickly.
@cwebber probably put it best when she described it as less of decentralized network and more of a product with an escape hatch. If we (Dorsey and his engineers) don't like management anymore, we can make all the user data portable, take a pile of capital and duplicate twitter somewhere else. The project is simply too top-heavy to replicate without a significant foundation behind it.
The only reason it's really "decentralized" is because cryptocurrencies are, and Dorsey and all of bsky's founders are either crypto-enthusiasts or actual coiners. It's the reason there are so many insane design choices which took place at the development stage that don't make any sense for a social network, but are that way because that's how a crypto-coder would make it. Being decentralized may have just been a side effect of that mentality.