@algernon @pluralistic @clintruin @simonzerafa @tante
Ok, sure. But you won't stop that train by purity testing other leftists. So what's the plan to stop openai ddosing all our blogs?
@algernon @pluralistic @clintruin @simonzerafa @tante
Ok, sure. But you won't stop that train by purity testing other leftists. So what's the plan to stop openai ddosing all our blogs?
> AI bubble bursts
For about ~30k I can run deepseek on a rig in my apartment, forever. That's pennies for a startup. How do you envision this bubble bursting such that LLMs are gone?
@pluralistic capital murder on the timeline
@tante questions for the leftists and liberals from a confused anarchist:
1. Do you think you can put the cat back in the bag with LLMs? How?
2. For those that believe that LLMs were trained on stolen data, what does it mean for data to be private, scarce property, that can be "stolen?"
3. What about models that just steal from the big boys, like the PRC ones? Theft from capitalists, surely ethical?
4. Will you not using any LLMs cause Sam Altman and friends to lose control of your country?
@dhd6 @tante @pluralistic @simonzerafa
Isn't this just purity testing? Aka liberal aestheticism masquerading as praxis?
The planet is hot because capitalism is a malformed cancer that can't stop growing until it kills itself and everything growing in its environment, not because a writer used an LLM. Therefore we need environment change to make capitalism maladaptive, see: ice age, mammals.
The environment is society, not one guy. Purity testing is the opposite of focusing on social change