@ThePowerNap @dragonfrog @cstross @ViennaMike I suspect I am coming from a very risk averse standpoint. The “summarise this” is what scares me with LLM marketing. I have been burned by poor software requirement specifications. Language simplification can do that in multiple sectors. But yeah mapping natural language to a fixed set of goals, that’s fine. Trust AI with my life, no. Sudden random steering inputs WTAF stelantis.
undefined
Nefarious Celt
@nefariouscelt@mastodon.scot
Posts
-
LLMs are spam generators. -
LLMs are spam generators.@ThePowerNap @dragonfrog @cstross @ViennaMike The best purpose of a LLM system is to provide a natural language interface to a complex but not mission critical system such as home automation, media libraries and switchboards.
Machine learning on the other hand should lean into seeing without eyes (is a dramatic jump in intensity cancer?)
Both of these cases should be powered through a single IEC C13 socket and not some gW data centre.
-
LLMs are spam generators.@david_chisnall @cstross I think I get this reference. (Confused Captain America face) But I was leaning into how an author needs to be told how they do not understand his own oeuvre. Something AI would excel at.
-
LLMs are spam generators.@cstross I disagree with you there.
I still believe the perfect use case for AI in content creation is to generate a virtual fan boy to tell an author that they are canonically wrong.
Self hosted self doubt as it were and less public than Usenet.