@rlonstein while this standard is neatly hidden behind swiss francs (ISO) there's this TI application note that spills the details:
https://www.ti.com/lit/an/sloa136/sloa136.pdf
When I wrote 'reader' earlier I meant the RF chip, because this is pretty low level stuff so if your reading equipment doesn't implement it there's no chance you can handle it...
@sjjh @Edent
petur 😶🇺🇦🇵🇸🇹🇼 -> FOSDEM
@peturdainn@mastodon.social
Posts
-
@Edent what's so bad about <div> ... or: Why do you want to avoid them? -
@Edent what's so bad about <div> ... or: Why do you want to avoid them?@rlonstein not really, I've done a project with a reader that handled ISO/IEC 14443 and 15693, and for both protocols there is collision handling possible: the reader will tell you that more than one tag answered to an inventory scan, and the n there's a defined algorithm to scan with a mask of UID bits so you can find all tags in the field.
My guess is that whoever implemented the gates just lets the read fail if a collision is detected.
@sjjh @Edent -
Om ontgoocheling over de aangekondigde intense #bloedmaan te vermijden: de rode maan komt pas op rond 20:20 vanavond, tijdens de schemering (= weinig contrast met de nog niet donkere hemel.@pfsmet ah thanks, dan ga ik hier in Gent zelfs geen moeite doen 😥