@whitequark@mastodon.social
You are obviously mistaken.
Even before HTML5 and before Animated PNG and SVG were specified, "The Treebuilder" has beautifully demonstrated various of viable possibilities with both SVG and XSLT, including JS inside SVG, and even embedding of fonts, which are significantly better than SWF. He did that with HTML4.
Therefore, XSLT has more potential than SWF ever had.
http://treebuilder.de/default.asp?file=313823.xml
Those so called "browser vendors" have deliberately ignored "The Treebuilder" in favour of what is known today as HTML5 and its subsequent privacy hazards, because it is in their interest to violate our privacy for the sake of "bills of exchange".
If The Treebuilder was known by most of the people who utilize those "HTML/HTTP browsers" then it would be obvious that those "browsers" are useless and fraudulent.
CC: @oblomov@sociale.network
You are obviously mistaken.
Even before HTML5 and before Animated PNG and SVG were specified, "The Treebuilder" has beautifully demonstrated various of viable possibilities with both SVG and XSLT, including JS inside SVG, and even embedding of fonts, which are significantly better than SWF. He did that with HTML4.
Therefore, XSLT has more potential than SWF ever had.
http://treebuilder.de/default.asp?file=313823.xml
Those so called "browser vendors" have deliberately ignored "The Treebuilder" in favour of what is known today as HTML5 and its subsequent privacy hazards, because it is in their interest to violate our privacy for the sake of "bills of exchange".
If The Treebuilder was known by most of the people who utilize those "HTML/HTTP browsers" then it would be obvious that those "browsers" are useless and fraudulent.
CC: @oblomov@sociale.network