False equivalence.
Both are important and need to be done, for different and overlapping reasons 🤔
False equivalence.
Both are important and need to be done, for different and overlapping reasons 🤔
If the device was mandatory for work then the employer reslly should have provided a dedicated device for work 🫤
I wonder what a decent lawyer would make of this?
Effectively the device was remotely accessed and wiped without permission, which should be a criminal offence.
Any backups? 😟
Edit: Inexpensive Samsung phones exist which are more than capable of acting as 2FA/2SA devices or for work contacts 😉