FEP website now displays the number of implementations for each implementable proposal:
Technical Discussion
6
Posts
2
Posters
0
Views
-
FEP website now displays the number of implementations for each implementable proposal:
https://fediverse.codeberg.page/fep/final/
These numbers are based on the information that authors provide in the "Implementations" section of a proposal.
By default, proposals are
informational, so authors need to opt in by addingtype: implementationto the metadata block. -
FEP website now displays the number of implementations for each implementable proposal:
https://fediverse.codeberg.page/fep/final/
These numbers are based on the information that authors provide in the "Implementations" section of a proposal.
By default, proposals are
informational, so authors need to opt in by addingtype: implementationto the metadata block.@silverpill Is that your work? Thanks!
Still, it makes me think even more that we should have some sort of software project × FEP matrix for implementation status info that's more easily editable by anyone (wiki-style?) and not solely reliant on the FEP authors keeping the implementation list up to date. Something like https://correct.webfinger-canary.fietkau.software/#implementation-status but collaborative.
-
@silverpill Is that your work? Thanks!
Still, it makes me think even more that we should have some sort of software project × FEP matrix for implementation status info that's more easily editable by anyone (wiki-style?) and not solely reliant on the FEP authors keeping the implementation list up to date. Something like https://correct.webfinger-canary.fietkau.software/#implementation-status but collaborative.
-
@silverpill @helge I couldn't find any explicit guidance for external contributions in FEP-a4ed. So the expected process would be to simply open a PR? Would that be merged by the respective FEP author or by a repository facilitator?
As you might know, I've been documenting FEP-044f implementations in Bridgy Fed's GitHub issue about that FEP, but I've been hesitant to dump reviewing/merging work on the sole author of FEP-044f just to “upstream” the information.
-
@silverpill @helge I couldn't find any explicit guidance for external contributions in FEP-a4ed. So the expected process would be to simply open a PR? Would that be merged by the respective FEP author or by a repository facilitator?
As you might know, I've been documenting FEP-044f implementations in Bridgy Fed's GitHub issue about that FEP, but I've been hesitant to dump reviewing/merging work on the sole author of FEP-044f just to “upstream” the information.
@julian Yes, just open a PR. It will be merged by a facilitator, but only if the author approves. Here's how it looks like: https://codeberg.org/fediverse/fep/pulls/758
-
@julian Yes, just open a PR. It will be merged by a facilitator, but only if the author approves. Here's how it looks like: https://codeberg.org/fediverse/fep/pulls/758
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
@silverpill @helge Alright, done:
-
@julian Yes, just open a PR. It will be merged by a facilitator, but only if the author approves. Here's how it looks like: https://codeberg.org/fediverse/fep/pulls/758
-
@silverpill @helge I couldn't find any explicit guidance for external contributions in FEP-a4ed. So the expected process would be to simply open a PR? Would that be merged by the respective FEP author or by a repository facilitator?
As you might know, I've been documenting FEP-044f implementations in Bridgy Fed's GitHub issue about that FEP, but I've been hesitant to dump reviewing/merging work on the sole author of FEP-044f just to “upstream” the information.
-
@julian The site was built by @helge, I also contribute to this project from time to time.
Yes, authors are responsible for maintaining implementation lists, but FEP process is meant to be collaborative and others can add missing implementations by opening a PR.
-
@silverpill Is that your work? Thanks!
Still, it makes me think even more that we should have some sort of software project × FEP matrix for implementation status info that's more easily editable by anyone (wiki-style?) and not solely reliant on the FEP authors keeping the implementation list up to date. Something like https://correct.webfinger-canary.fietkau.software/#implementation-status but collaborative.
-
FEP website now displays the number of implementations for each implementable proposal:
https://fediverse.codeberg.page/fep/final/
These numbers are based on the information that authors provide in the "Implementations" section of a proposal.
By default, proposals are informational, so authors need to opt in by adding type: implementation to the metadata block.
-
@mapache@hachyderm.io yes that's correct, Lemmy, Piefed, NodeBB, and Mbin.
-
@julian interesting! thanks for sharing. Is the threadiverse forums like nodebb or lemmy?
