-
My favorite protest sign of all the ones I've seen in my feed, from the latest #NoKings2 protest.
Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Uncategorized nokings2 hootintootintuesday mastodon humor humour funnymeme nokings protestsigns
1
0 Votes1 Posts11 Views
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
I have a couple of comments regarding the spec https://codeberg.org/portafed/portafed/src/branch/main/portafed-spec/spec.md
It contains a comparison with FEP-ef61, but it is not quite correct:
- FEP-ef61 identity is not actor-rooted. The closest equivalent of FEP-ef61 identity in normal ActivityPub is a server with a domain name. A single FEP-ef61 authority can manage multiple actor documents.
- FEP-ef61 does not lack a migration flow. Strictly speaking, it doesn't need one, because data is not attached to a server and can be continuously synchronized between multiple servers. But a more familiar migration flow is also possible via outbox export-import.
-
@benpate That would be great and happy to contribute wherever it fits.
My guess on the scope decision is the same as yours: hostile-server recovery is genuinely harder, and a cooperative spec is already a lot to get right. Makes sense to tackle it separately.
Take your time reading. I'll put together a short write-up of how MigrationProof could slot into the existing spec easier to react to something concrete than to an abstract pitch.
-
@jonny@neuromatch.social tracks doesn't it 😝
-
-
Warm up the fire! We're LIVE!
Summer in Winter: Norcal Gma 2's Journey with her Dog - E79
#owncast #streaming #interview #fediverse #fedi #people #show #firesidefedi #FsF
-
@PortaFed That's awesome. Let's work you into the existing effort. We could use all the help we can get.
Also: I'm pretty new to the data portability spec; so I know that "hostile server" is out of scope, but I wasn't there to know why that choice was made. I'm *guessing* is was too much to tackle at the time.
But one way or another, it would be great to have something in place for this situation, too.
I still need to read your work fully, so I understand what we're talking about :)
-
@benpate Yes, that’s exactly the gap I’m aiming at: the case where the old server is gone, hostile, or unavailable, and the user needs some way to carry forward verifiable account state without relying on that server’s cooperation.
My reading is that LOLA covers the cooperative portability path well, while this harsher failure case still needs more work. I don’t see PortaFed as a competing standard so much as a possible building block for that scenario.
-
OpenAI lancia Codex Security: 10.561 bug di sicurezza scoperti in 30 giorni
📌 Link all'articolo : https://www.redhotcyber.com/post/openai-lancia-codex-security-10-561-bug-di-sicurezza-scoperti-in-30-giorni/
#redhotcyber #news #cybersecurity #intelligenzaartificiale #sicurezzainformatica #devsecops #sviluppatore
Post suggeriti
-
Introducing PortaFed — cryptographic account portability for #ActivityPub
Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Fediverso activitypub fediverse0 Votes13 Posts12 Views -
Warm up the fire!
Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Fediverso owncast streaming interview fediverse fedi people show firesidefedi0 Votes1 Posts0 Views -
OpenAI lancia Codex Security: 10.561 bug di sicurezza scoperti in 30 giorni
Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News redhotcyber news cybersecurity intelligenzaartificial sicurezzainformatica devsecops sviluppatore
1
0 Votes1 Posts0 Views -
I Droni colpiscono il cloud!
Watching Ignoring Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved News redhotcyber news cybersecurity cloudcomputing datacenter vulnerabilita infrastrutturecritiche
1
0 Votes1 Posts0 Views