whomever is attacking #Mastodon instances, is doing so to render the #fediverse network unusable

[blogdiva@mastodon.social]

whomever is attacking #Mastodon instances, is doing so to render the #fediverse network unusable

[bobsee@hachyderm.io]

@blogdiva why else?

[coriopsicologia@mastodon.social]

@blogdiva What's happening?

[hubertmanne@piefed.social]

yeah i have seen some wierdness with voting lately but thats it.

[muddle@infosec.exchange]

@blogdiva *"Whoever," but whatever...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypercorrection

[muddle@infosec.exchange]

@blogdiva No offence intended here. It's just that "whom" is a really weird word for people to grapple with these days. It's almost vestigial at this stage? I mean, English kind of has a case system but outside of when to use "you and I" or "you and me" or the set phrase "to whom it may concern" (or "for whom the bell tolls," maybe) nobody really gives it a second thought, or even cares about the distinction..

which, I guess makes my correction, in a sense, less than useless. I'm OK with that and I hope someone/anyone reading this is OK with it too.

[nathanmurdock@mastodon.social]

@blogdiva that may be true. From my perspective at mastodon.social, I see no change. What exactly are you seeing that is different or changed? Here we have no federated or local timelines since January.

So, if it's only seen there, no wonder I haven't seen it.

[feloniouspunk@beige.party]

@muddle @blogdiva Did you just reply-guy yourself?

[muddle@infosec.exchange]

@FeloniousPunk @blogdiva IDK. I'm wary of making corrections for fear of coming across as some sort of creep. I just think that this one is just so obviously not a cause worth fighting over that we can all just reach the same "whatever" conclusion and move along.

So I guess what I'm saying if that if you noticed my notice, you will notice that it was not worth noticing.

[hackbyte@joinfriendica.de]

@blogdiva Isn't it nice that mastodon is _NOT_ the whole #fediverse? ;)