Salta al contenuto
0
  • Home
  • Piero Bosio
  • Blog
  • Mondo
  • Fediverso
  • News
  • Categorie
  • Old Web Site
  • Recenti
  • Popolare
  • Tag
  • Utenti
  • Home
  • Piero Bosio
  • Blog
  • Mondo
  • Fediverso
  • News
  • Categorie
  • Old Web Site
  • Recenti
  • Popolare
  • Tag
  • Utenti
Skin
  • Chiaro
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Scuro
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Predefinito (Cerulean)
  • Nessuna skin
Collassa

Piero Bosio Social Web Site Personale Logo Fediverso

Social Forum federato con il resto del mondo. Non contano le istanze, contano le persone
  1. Home
  2. Categorie
  3. TechTakes
  4. Stubsack: weekly thread for sneers not worth an entire post, week ending 22nd February 2026

Stubsack: weekly thread for sneers not worth an entire post, week ending 22nd February 2026

Pianificato Fissato Bloccato Spostato TechTakes
techtakes
12 Post 8 Autori 0 Visualizzazioni
  • Da Vecchi a Nuovi
  • Da Nuovi a Vecchi
  • Più Voti
Rispondi
  • Risposta alla discussione
Effettua l'accesso per rispondere
Questa discussione è stata eliminata. Solo gli utenti con diritti di gestione possono vederla.
  • bluemonday1984@awful.systemsundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
    bluemonday1984@awful.systemsundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
    bluemonday1984@awful.systems
    scritto su ultima modifica di
    #1

    Want to wade into the snowy surf of the abyss? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid.

    Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

    Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

    If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

    The post Xitter web has spawned so many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

    Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

    (Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this. Also, hope you had a wonderful Valentine's Day!)

    samvines@awful.systemsundefined scruiser@awful.systemsundefined macroplastic@sh.itjust.worksundefined 3 Risposte Ultima Risposta
    0
    • bluemonday1984@awful.systemsundefined bluemonday1984@awful.systems

      Want to wade into the snowy surf of the abyss? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid.

      Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

      Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

      If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

      The post Xitter web has spawned so many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

      Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

      (Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this. Also, hope you had a wonderful Valentine's Day!)

      samvines@awful.systemsundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
      samvines@awful.systemsundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
      samvines@awful.systems
      scritto su ultima modifica di
      #2

      AI bros are seizing the means of computation: RAM, GPUs, SSDs and now HDDs...

      I don't think there's an actual conspiracy, just lots of MBAs following their noses towards the $$$.

      That said, time to buy a new lipo battery for that 10 year old laptop in the loft and stick Linux on it - before the lithium miners announce they've sold the next 12 months global supply of Lithium to Altman because he needs it to sleep at night...

      1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
      1
      0
      • oblomov@sociale.networkundefined oblomov@sociale.network ha condiviso questa discussione su
      • bluemonday1984@awful.systemsundefined bluemonday1984@awful.systems

        Want to wade into the snowy surf of the abyss? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid.

        Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

        Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

        If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

        The post Xitter web has spawned so many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

        Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

        (Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this. Also, hope you had a wonderful Valentine's Day!)

        scruiser@awful.systemsundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
        scruiser@awful.systemsundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
        scruiser@awful.systems
        scritto su ultima modifica di
        #3

        A little exchange on the EA forums I thought was notable: https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/EDBQPT65XJsgszwmL/long-term-risks-from-ideological-fanaticism?commentId=b5pZi5JjoMixQtRgh

        tldr; a super long essay lumping together Nazism, Communism and religious fundamentalism (I didn't read it, just the comments). The comment I linked notes how liberal democracies have also killed a huge number of people (in the commenter's home country, in the name of purging communism):

        The United States presented liberal democracy as a universal emancipatory framework while materially supporting anti-communist purges in my country during what is often called the “Jakarta Method". Between 500,000 and 1 million people were killed in 1965–66, with encouragement and intelligence support from Western powers. Variations of this model were later replicated in parts of Latin America.

        The OP's response is to try to explain how that wasn't real "liberal democracy" and to try to reframe the discussion. Another commenter is even more direct, they complain half the sources listed are Marxist.

        A bit bold to unqualifiedly recommend a list of thinkers of which ~half were Marxists, on the topic of ideological fanaticism causing great harms.

        I think it's a bit bold of this commenter to ignore the empirical facts cited in how many people 'liberal democracies' had killed and to exclude sources simply for challenging your ideology.

        Just another reminder of how the EA movement is full of right wing thinking and how most of it hasn't considered even the most basic of leftist thought.

        oblomov@sociale.networkundefined 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
        1
        0
        • bluemonday1984@awful.systemsundefined bluemonday1984@awful.systems

          Want to wade into the snowy surf of the abyss? Have a sneer percolating in your system but not enough time/energy to make a whole post about it? Go forth and be mid.

          Welcome to the Stubsack, your first port of call for learning fresh Awful you’ll near-instantly regret.

          Any awful.systems sub may be subsneered in this subthread, techtakes or no.

          If your sneer seems higher quality than you thought, feel free to cut’n’paste it into its own post — there’s no quota for posting and the bar really isn’t that high.

          The post Xitter web has spawned so many “esoteric” right wing freaks, but there’s no appropriate sneer-space for them. I’m talking redscare-ish, reality challenged “culture critics” who write about everything but understand nothing. I’m talking about reply-guys who make the same 6 tweets about the same 3 subjects. They’re inescapable at this point, yet I don’t see them mocked (as much as they should be)

          Like, there was one dude a while back who insisted that women couldn’t be surgeons because they didn’t believe in the moon or in stars? I think each and every one of these guys is uniquely fucked up and if I can’t escape them, I would love to sneer at them.

          (Credit and/or blame to David Gerard for starting this. Also, hope you had a wonderful Valentine's Day!)

          macroplastic@sh.itjust.worksundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
          macroplastic@sh.itjust.worksundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
          macroplastic@sh.itjust.works
          scritto su ultima modifica di
          #4

          who up continvoucly morging they branches

          bluemonday1984@awful.systemsundefined 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
          0
          • scruiser@awful.systemsundefined scruiser@awful.systems

            A little exchange on the EA forums I thought was notable: https://forum.effectivealtruism.org/posts/EDBQPT65XJsgszwmL/long-term-risks-from-ideological-fanaticism?commentId=b5pZi5JjoMixQtRgh

            tldr; a super long essay lumping together Nazism, Communism and religious fundamentalism (I didn't read it, just the comments). The comment I linked notes how liberal democracies have also killed a huge number of people (in the commenter's home country, in the name of purging communism):

            The United States presented liberal democracy as a universal emancipatory framework while materially supporting anti-communist purges in my country during what is often called the “Jakarta Method". Between 500,000 and 1 million people were killed in 1965–66, with encouragement and intelligence support from Western powers. Variations of this model were later replicated in parts of Latin America.

            The OP's response is to try to explain how that wasn't real "liberal democracy" and to try to reframe the discussion. Another commenter is even more direct, they complain half the sources listed are Marxist.

            A bit bold to unqualifiedly recommend a list of thinkers of which ~half were Marxists, on the topic of ideological fanaticism causing great harms.

            I think it's a bit bold of this commenter to ignore the empirical facts cited in how many people 'liberal democracies' had killed and to exclude sources simply for challenging your ideology.

            Just another reminder of how the EA movement is full of right wing thinking and how most of it hasn't considered even the most basic of leftist thought.

            oblomov@sociale.networkundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
            oblomov@sociale.networkundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
            oblomov@sociale.network
            scritto su ultima modifica di
            #5

            @scruiser @BlueMonday1984 funny how they mock left wingers for «that wasn't real communism» and then come up with the same excuses for liberal democracies and capitalism whenever one points out all the shit that came out of that. It's really ALWAYS projection with them, isn't it?

            scruiser@awful.systemsundefined 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
            0
            • macroplastic@sh.itjust.worksundefined macroplastic@sh.itjust.works

              who up continvoucly morging they branches

              bluemonday1984@awful.systemsundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
              bluemonday1984@awful.systemsundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
              bluemonday1984@awful.systems
              scritto su ultima modifica di
              #6

              That slopped-out "diagram" plagiarised Vincent Driessen’s “A successful Git branching model”, BTW.

              o7___o7@awful.systemsundefined 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
              0
              • bluemonday1984@awful.systemsundefined bluemonday1984@awful.systems

                That slopped-out "diagram" plagiarised Vincent Driessen’s “A successful Git branching model”, BTW.

                o7___o7@awful.systemsundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                o7___o7@awful.systemsundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                o7___o7@awful.systems
                scritto su ultima modifica di
                #7

                It's funny that such a thing is rare enough in the corpus to come out so recognizably in the output.

                froztbyte@awful.systemsundefined 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
                0
                • oblomov@sociale.networkundefined oblomov@sociale.network

                  @scruiser @BlueMonday1984 funny how they mock left wingers for «that wasn't real communism» and then come up with the same excuses for liberal democracies and capitalism whenever one points out all the shit that came out of that. It's really ALWAYS projection with them, isn't it?

                  scruiser@awful.systemsundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                  scruiser@awful.systemsundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                  scruiser@awful.systems
                  scritto su ultima modifica di
                  #8

                  This reminds me of a discussion I had recently on a fanfic discord (the discussion was sparked by the March for Billionaires...). Someone claimed no country had ever pulled itself out of poverty except by capitalism, so I bring up China and the USSR, but apparently those don't count for the person I was arguing with. They claimed the stats were Goodharted and also that what I was saying was tankie bullshit. I gave up at that point (I probably shouldn't have bothered in the first place). Like how exactly did they fake or Goodhart going from literal feudalism to industrial superpowers? Also, I find it notable how EAs and "The Better Angels of Our Nature" type neoliberals are perfectly happy to use overall stats as metrics when it makes a point they are in favor of. "Your GDP went up 3.2%, please ignore the mass environmental devastation from colonialism and neocolonialism that makes your traditional way of life unlivable and thank us Westerners."

                  oblomov@sociale.networkundefined 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
                  0
                  • o7___o7@awful.systemsundefined o7___o7@awful.systems

                    It's funny that such a thing is rare enough in the corpus to come out so recognizably in the output.

                    froztbyte@awful.systemsundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                    froztbyte@awful.systemsundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                    froztbyte@awful.systems
                    scritto su ultima modifica di
                    #9

                    ime much like the SAFe diagrams, this diagram is all over a certain type of “this is how your corporation should be developing software” thotleader posts

                    (although I imagine the lag 2~3y all those heads have pivoted to promptpraise)

                    froztbyte@awful.systemsundefined 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
                    0
                    • scruiser@awful.systemsundefined scruiser@awful.systems

                      This reminds me of a discussion I had recently on a fanfic discord (the discussion was sparked by the March for Billionaires...). Someone claimed no country had ever pulled itself out of poverty except by capitalism, so I bring up China and the USSR, but apparently those don't count for the person I was arguing with. They claimed the stats were Goodharted and also that what I was saying was tankie bullshit. I gave up at that point (I probably shouldn't have bothered in the first place). Like how exactly did they fake or Goodhart going from literal feudalism to industrial superpowers? Also, I find it notable how EAs and "The Better Angels of Our Nature" type neoliberals are perfectly happy to use overall stats as metrics when it makes a point they are in favor of. "Your GDP went up 3.2%, please ignore the mass environmental devastation from colonialism and neocolonialism that makes your traditional way of life unlivable and thank us Westerners."

                      oblomov@sociale.networkundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                      oblomov@sociale.networkundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                      oblomov@sociale.network
                      scritto su ultima modifica di
                      #10

                      @scruiser there's no winning with these guys. I had a similar experience with someone bringing up South Korea as an example of country that brought itself up by its bootstraps via unfettered capitalism because “planned economy doesn't work”, so I had to remind them that SK was a military dictatorship who implemented 5-year plans leveraging billions of foreign investment that was given to it by US to prop it up against NK.

                      fullsquare@awful.systemsundefined 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
                      0
                      • oblomov@sociale.networkundefined oblomov@sociale.network

                        @scruiser there's no winning with these guys. I had a similar experience with someone bringing up South Korea as an example of country that brought itself up by its bootstraps via unfettered capitalism because “planned economy doesn't work”, so I had to remind them that SK was a military dictatorship who implemented 5-year plans leveraging billions of foreign investment that was given to it by US to prop it up against NK.

                        fullsquare@awful.systemsundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                        fullsquare@awful.systemsundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                        fullsquare@awful.systems
                        scritto su ultima modifica di
                        #11

                        it's crazy how people memoryholed that (and japan doing the same, and a handful of other countries). or how until 2022 war norway wasn't really thought of as petrostate by people who didn't pay attention. or how ten years ago, if you said that putin bombed apartments to wage war on chechenya to win elections all to pardon yeltsin, people would think that you're a crackpot

                        1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
                        1
                        0
                        • froztbyte@awful.systemsundefined froztbyte@awful.systems

                          ime much like the SAFe diagrams, this diagram is all over a certain type of “this is how your corporation should be developing software” thotleader posts

                          (although I imagine the lag 2~3y all those heads have pivoted to promptpraise)

                          froztbyte@awful.systemsundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                          froztbyte@awful.systemsundefined Questo utente è esterno a questo forum
                          froztbyte@awful.systems
                          scritto su ultima modifica di
                          #12

                          https://nvie.com/posts/15-years-later/

                          Other than that, I find this whole thing mostly very saddening. Not because some company used my diagram. As I said, it's been everywhere for 15 years and I've always been fine with that. What's dispiriting is the (lack of) process and care: take someone's carefully crafted work, run it through a machine to wash off the fingerprints, and ship it as your own.

                          1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
                          1
                          0

                          Ciao! Sembra che tu sia interessato a questa conversazione, ma non hai ancora un account.

                          Stanco di dover scorrere gli stessi post a ogni visita? Quando registri un account, tornerai sempre esattamente dove eri rimasto e potrai scegliere di essere avvisato delle nuove risposte (tramite email o notifica push). Potrai anche salvare segnalibri e votare i post per mostrare il tuo apprezzamento agli altri membri della comunità.

                          Con il tuo contributo, questo post potrebbe essere ancora migliore 💗

                          Registrati Accedi
                          Rispondi
                          • Risposta alla discussione
                          Effettua l'accesso per rispondere
                          • Da Vecchi a Nuovi
                          • Da Nuovi a Vecchi
                          • Più Voti


                          Feed RSS
                          Stubsack: weekly thread for sneers not worth an entire post, week ending 22nd February 2026
                          @pierobosio@soc.bosio.info
                          V4.10.1 Contributors
                          • Accedi

                          • Accedi o registrati per effettuare la ricerca.
                          • Primo post
                            Ultimo post