Skip to content

Piero Bosio Social Web Site Personale Logo Fediverso

Social Forum federato con il resto del mondo. Non contano le istanze, contano le persone
  1. Home
  2. Categories
  3. Technical Discussion
  4. @julian that is why:

@julian that is why:

Technical Discussion
2 2 3
Log in to reply

Feed RSS
@julian that is why:

Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
@pierobosio@soc.bosio.info
Post suggeriti
  • julian@activitypub.spaceundefined

    WP group actor ID URL encoded?

    Technical Discussion wordpress activitypub
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    0 Views
    julian@activitypub.spaceundefined
    @pfefferle@mastodon.social I'm frankly surprised I ran into a side effect of this so soon after you updated the site :laughing: Either the PR is to be reverted or perhaps WP should handle requests to the URL encoded address :shrug: But after briefing myself on the root cause, it does seem weird that there exist actors with unicode in their ID. Might be if that is the case you should disregard them as non-compliant, who knows. cc @silverpill@mitra.social
  • julian@activitypub.spaceundefined

    FEP-f15d: Context Relocation and Removal

    Technical Discussion activitypub fep threadiverse
    6
    2 Votes
    6 Posts
    9 Views
    julian@activitypub.spaceundefined
    Hi @silverpill@mitra.social right; Move and Remove are explicit actions concerning membership of a context in an audience. Update is overly broad and receivers would have to infer audience change based on what the updated object contains (e.g. Audience Y is suddenly missing, and Z is new, was this always the case?) It is likely that sending audience as an array will not be correctly interpreted by existing software, so this property is an unreliable indicator of context audience membership at best Existing threadiverse apps check addresses, and audience may not be used at all in some. There is no conflict with Move(Person), and I have not heard a convincing reason to adopt a new activity type when these two AS activities work quite well to describe what we want to accomplish.
  • box464@mastodon.socialundefined

    So what’s the ActivityPub version of Pinterest?

    Technical Discussion pinterest activitypub fedidev
    14
    0 Votes
    14 Posts
    9 Views
    thenexusofprivacy@infosec.exchangeundefined
    @box464 Piefed's gallery view is the closest approximation I know of. Pinetta was more directly focused trying to be a Pinboard alternative hasn't been updated in a couple of years.
  • eyeinthesky@mastodon.socialundefined

    "Critical concept: IRIs are opaque identifiers.

    Technical Discussion activitypub
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    2 Views
    eyeinthesky@mastodon.socialundefined
    "Critical concept: IRIs are opaque identifiers. You cannot infer meaning from the string pattern — only by dereferencing and inspecting the data." [1] This applies to URIs too. Sadly, almost no #ActivityPub implementations use this principle. Multi-tenant servers and simple account portability (with personal domains) would be relatively easy if they did.🙄 It is what it is.../cc @melvincarvalho [1] https://socialdocs.org/docs/concepts/uris-iris-linked-data/