Skip to content

Piero Bosio Social Web Site Personale Logo Fediverso

Social Forum federato con il resto del mondo. Non contano le istanze, contano le persone
  1. Home
  2. Categories
  3. Fediverso
  4. In the Fediverse track at SFSCon, André Menrath spoke about:

In the Fediverse track at SFSCon, André Menrath spoke about:

Fediverso
1 1 0
Log in to reply

Feed RSS
In the Fediverse track at SFSCon, André Menrath spoke about:

Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
@pierobosio@soc.bosio.info
Post suggeriti
  • toddsundsted@epiktistes.comundefined

    Polls are rendering!

    Moved Technical Discussion ktistec activitypub fediverse
    1
    1
    1 Votes
    1 Posts
    1 Views
    toddsundsted@epiktistes.comundefined
    Polls are rendering!screenshot of the latest emoji poll rendered on the ktistec serverI'm working to get all of the little visual elements available across the Fediverse to render in a usable way on Ktistec. When released, users will also be able to vote on polls.#ktistec #activitypub #fediverse
  • juergen_hubert@mementomori.socialundefined

    I think I have identified a fairly significant flaw in how the #Fediverse currently operates.

    Fediverso fediverse mastodon friendica pixelfed peertube bookwyrm activitypub fedihelp
    1
    1
    0 Votes
    1 Posts
    8 Views
    juergen_hubert@mementomori.socialundefined
    I think I have identified a fairly significant flaw in how the #Fediverse currently operates. Hear me out.The Fediverse currently consists of all sorts of different systems - #Mastodon, #Friendica , #Pixelfed , #PeerTube, #BookWyrm , and so forth. And while they are all connected via the #ActivityPub protocol, they all have different functionalities and different ways of presenting themselves. Which is as it should be, because Diversity Is Our Strength(TM).However, it is here that the ActivityPub-based interactivity hits its limits - for usually, you can either experience the relevant system as it was intended, or you can interact with it, but not both - _unless_ you have an account on the same system (though not necessarily on the same instance).Let's say that you are a Mastodon user who looks at another person's BookWyrm page. You scroll through their books, posts, and comments. Then you see some comment you want to comment on yourself, but can you do so?Not directly. You need to figure out the URL of their comment, and then copy and paste that comment into the search bar of your Mastodon instance. Then it will show up in the same format as a Mastodon post, and you can interact with it - boost it, like it, comment on it.Sure, it works, but it's a whole lot of tedious effort.Or you can search for the user account in Mastodon and scroll through all their posts and comments as if they were a Mastodon user - and thus, you will miss out on all the unique user interface features of BookWyrm.So what is missing?Well, Mastodon already has an "Open original page" feature when looking at someone's post. What we need is an "Open original page AND AUTHENTICATE" feature. This way, the target instance (whatever software they are using) could acknowledge the viewer as an external user who could nevertheless fully interact with the local user interface, including the ability to boost, like, and make comments.This is something that should be theoretically possible to implement, right? #FediHelp
  • evan@cosocial.caundefined

    Friends, I will be speaking tomorrow at #WebSocialBR, the open social web event in Brasilia.

    Fediverso websocialbr fediverse socialweb
    3
    0 Votes
    3 Posts
    12 Views
    evan@cosocial.caundefined
    @jamesmarshall 4PM Brazil, which is 2PM ET and 11AM PT.
  • fedigarden@social.growyourown.servicesundefined

    - Are you the admin on a public Fediverse server which has sign-ups open?- Would you like your server listed on https://fedi.garden ?- Is your server compatible with all seven points at https://fedi.garden/about-this-site

    Uncategorized fediverse mastodon fediadmin mastoadmin
    2
    0 Votes
    2 Posts
    13 Views
    julian@activitypub.spaceundefined
    fedigarden@social.growyourown.services I would like to submit ActivityPub.space to this list but I am unable to comply with Threads defederation. We are topic-focused around AP development and would not want to exclude those developers outright. There are occasionally discussions about Threads/AP interop that could be useful and on-topic. It'd be like closing off discussion about ATProto/AP discussion by blocking BridgyFed. I could consider something like an opt-in for that domain?