Salta al contenuto
0
  • Home
  • Piero Bosio
  • Blog
  • Mondo
  • Fediverso
  • News
  • Categorie
  • Old Web Site
  • Recenti
  • Popolare
  • Tag
  • Utenti
  • Home
  • Piero Bosio
  • Blog
  • Mondo
  • Fediverso
  • News
  • Categorie
  • Old Web Site
  • Recenti
  • Popolare
  • Tag
  • Utenti
Skin
  • Chiaro
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Scuro
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Predefinito (Nessuna skin)
  • Nessuna skin
Collassa

Piero Bosio Social Web Site Personale Logo Fediverso

Social Forum federato con il resto del mondo. Non contano le istanze, contano le persone
  1. Home
  2. Categorie
  3. Fediverse
  4. New Social Web Working Group at W3C

New Social Web Working Group at W3C

Pianificato Fissato Bloccato Spostato Fediverse
fediverse
11 Post 7 Autori 91 Visualizzazioni
  • Da Vecchi a Nuovi
  • Da Nuovi a Vecchi
  • Più Voti
Rispondi
  • Risposta alla discussione
Effettua l'accesso per rispondere
Questa discussione è stata eliminata. Solo gli utenti con diritti di gestione possono vederla.
  • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
    This post did not contain any content.
    breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca
    breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca
    breakfastmtn@lemmy.ca
    scritto su ultima modifica di
    #2

    One Community Group document that will be moving into the Working Group is LOLA, the live data portability spec that originated in the CG’s Data Portability Task Force. LOLA lets users move from one ActivityPub server to another while retaining all their social connections, their content, and their reactions. It’s a great improvement for data portability on the social web.

    Exciting stuff!

    1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
    0
    • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
      This post did not contain any content.
      cibbecker@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      cibbecker@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      cibbecker@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      scritto su ultima modifica di
      #3

      Awesome!

      1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
      0
      • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
        This post did not contain any content.
        fizz@lemmy.nz
        fizz@lemmy.nz
        fizz@lemmy.nz
        scritto su ultima modifica di
        #4

        Are the Lemmy and piefed devs going to be a part of this? We need some representation so its not all addressing micro blogging things

        julian@activitypub.space 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
        0
        • fizz@lemmy.nz fizz@lemmy.nz

          Are the Lemmy and piefed devs going to be a part of this? We need some representation so its not all addressing micro blogging things

          julian@activitypub.space
          julian@activitypub.space
          julian@activitypub.space
          scritto su ultima modifica di
          #5

          To my knowledge, one must be an "invited expert" in order to join these discussions.

          However, the working group is only one aspect. The community group has been in existence for a number of years. I am part of that group (although I admit I don't go to as many meetings as I ought to), and try to represent the threadiverse as best as I can.

          1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
          0
          • schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de
            This post did not contain any content.
            mooglemaestro@lemmy.zip
            mooglemaestro@lemmy.zip
            mooglemaestro@lemmy.zip
            scritto su ultima modifica di
            #6

            While LOLA is great, I'd really love an established handshake mechanism for having two accounts on two bespoke services represent the same user.

            For example, I want to have a pixel fed and mastodon presence that can be authored between the two. However, you currently can't make two accounts that are effectively linked to each other. I feel like this linking is important for further decentralizing the fediverse (by effectively decentralizing the user itself)

            julian@activitypub.space rako@tarte.nuage-libre.fr 2 Risposte Ultima Risposta
            0
            • mooglemaestro@lemmy.zip mooglemaestro@lemmy.zip

              While LOLA is great, I'd really love an established handshake mechanism for having two accounts on two bespoke services represent the same user.

              For example, I want to have a pixel fed and mastodon presence that can be authored between the two. However, you currently can't make two accounts that are effectively linked to each other. I feel like this linking is important for further decentralizing the fediverse (by effectively decentralizing the user itself)

              julian@activitypub.space
              julian@activitypub.space
              julian@activitypub.space
              scritto su ultima modifica di
              #7

              This is something I believe the ActivityPub API can tackle...

              1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
              0
              • mooglemaestro@lemmy.zip mooglemaestro@lemmy.zip

                While LOLA is great, I'd really love an established handshake mechanism for having two accounts on two bespoke services represent the same user.

                For example, I want to have a pixel fed and mastodon presence that can be authored between the two. However, you currently can't make two accounts that are effectively linked to each other. I feel like this linking is important for further decentralizing the fediverse (by effectively decentralizing the user itself)

                rako@tarte.nuage-libre.fr
                rako@tarte.nuage-libre.fr
                rako@tarte.nuage-libre.fr
                scritto su ultima modifica di
                #8

                That's because AP as it is implemented today is crap, it's a superficial compatibility layer on top of a proprietary (as in, doing non-standardized stuff) platform. We need to take it on its head and make AP the actual core then build on top but that requires some work

                julian@activitypub.space 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
                0
                • rako@tarte.nuage-libre.fr rako@tarte.nuage-libre.fr

                  That's because AP as it is implemented today is crap, it's a superficial compatibility layer on top of a proprietary (as in, doing non-standardized stuff) platform. We need to take it on its head and make AP the actual core then build on top but that requires some work

                  julian@activitypub.space
                  julian@activitypub.space
                  julian@activitypub.space
                  scritto su ultima modifica di
                  #9

                  What is this proprietary layer you speak of?

                  1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
                  0
                  • rako@tarte.nuage-libre.fr
                    rako@tarte.nuage-libre.fr
                    rako@tarte.nuage-libre.fr
                    scritto su ultima modifica di
                    #10

                    The mastodon api, or the lemmy api, or the xyz api. Eagh platform has its own. Being public doesn't make it standard, hence the "proprietary" qualifier

                    julian@activitypub.space 1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
                    0
                    • rako@tarte.nuage-libre.fr rako@tarte.nuage-libre.fr

                      The mastodon api, or the lemmy api, or the xyz api. Eagh platform has its own. Being public doesn't make it standard, hence the "proprietary" qualifier

                      julian@activitypub.space
                      julian@activitypub.space
                      julian@activitypub.space
                      scritto su ultima modifica di
                      #11

                      Oh I see. Yes, AP first apps would be great, but getting older apps connected via AP is important too.

                      NodeBB predates ActivityPub (or came around the same time), and so we added it recently. It works quite well with our existing code. Not much of a compatibility layer.

                      1 Risposta Ultima Risposta
                      0

                      Ciao! Sembra che tu sia interessato a questa conversazione, ma non hai ancora un account.

                      Stanco di dover scorrere gli stessi post a ogni visita? Quando registri un account, tornerai sempre esattamente dove eri rimasto e potrai scegliere di essere avvisato delle nuove risposte (tramite email o notifica push). Potrai anche salvare segnalibri e votare i post per mostrare il tuo apprezzamento agli altri membri della comunità.

                      Con il tuo contributo, questo post potrebbe essere ancora migliore 💗

                      Registrati Accedi
                      Rispondi
                      • Risposta alla discussione
                      Effettua l'accesso per rispondere
                      • Da Vecchi a Nuovi
                      • Da Nuovi a Vecchi
                      • Più Voti


                      Feed RSS
                      New Social Web Working Group at W3C
                      @pierobosio@soc.bosio.info
                      NodeBB Contributors
                      • Accedi

                      • Accedi o registrati per effettuare la ricerca.
                      • Primo post
                        Ultimo post