Skip to content

Piero Bosio Social Web Site Personale Logo Fediverso

Social Forum federato con il resto del mondo. Non contano le istanze, contano le persone

Here's another #FEP for representing torrents on activitypub :)


Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
Post suggeriti
  • 0 Votes
    13 Posts
    33 Views
    silverpill@mitra.social I have been reflecting on the use of Remove/Move vs Update and I am thinking that Update isn't explicit enough. If I am removing a topic from a category, I'd be sending an Update with the group actor removed from the audience property. However recipients wouldn't know which audience was removed, merely the new state of that context's audience.
  • 0 Votes
    2 Posts
    14 Views
    @julian I would ask @Claire who is the FEP author
  • WordPress and 844e

    Uncategorized fep 844e activitypub wordpress
    5
    0 Votes
    5 Posts
    32 Views
    silverpill@mitra.social the second code example in FEP 844e is wrong though, it uses [ and ] instead of { and } around the "object" in implements
  • 0 Votes
    9 Posts
    51 Views
    trwnh@mastodon.social Yes you're right, some messiness is bound to happen. I'm not trying to force all implementations into a specific inheritance pattern, that's why it's a "should", not a "must". Even then one of my concerns is that while in an ideal scenario, everybody inheriting their parent context leads to an entire collection all referencing the same context... in reality a lot of messiness will occur, objects will reference other contexts all over the place, etc. At the end of the day it's best effort, and if we are able to handle all that and still get to a point where backfill is achievable, then that's a win in my books. > it depends on how much you embrace the idea of each publisher being allowed to make their own claims (and how much you allow "clean up" after the fact) Part of me would like this to not happen, but it is unavoidable.