RE: https://hachyderm.io/@ridley/116359676121397755
OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG
RE: https://hachyderm.io/@ridley/116359676121397755
OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG OMG
total pronkification
@jessebot https://fossandcrafts.org/hack-and-craft/ Twice a month! Feel free to join!
Well I'm up on the weigh-in and down on the ten day average. Fluctuations happen so I'm not worried!
@jessebot It's open to anyone as long as they follow the code of conduct!
@Gnuxie @theotheroracle Oh I'm not saying they're doing that in terms of the infrastructure of the the vibecoded slopware they are bragging about in their blogposts being something they support or that gets them there.
The goal of that stuff is not to be software that is used.
The goal of it is for people to switch to using Cloudflare as a *host*, not just middleware, and to be convinced that Cloudflare's infrastructure should be relied upon to the degree that they get bought in, in the way people rely on AWS
@civodul I don't think it's a joke. They've done this several times before. It's been a mess every time. Abandonware slop to brag about.
@jfred oh no, it's their own cloudflare workers thing, of course
@jfred It does, and I wonder what it's using, and if it's endo
@AbyssalRook To be fair to them the *approaches* they are advocating of using capability security are the right ones.
But vibecoding another abandonware project and bragging about having solved the future is just, ugh
@ridley yupppp
@theotheroracle Because they are doing their best to be more than just a web proxy, and actually be the complete internet
(I lied, Cloudflare is not, in any way, my buddy)
Cloudflare, buddy, you gotta stop making these posts. You gotta stop https://blog.cloudflare.com/emdash-wordpress/
@clarfonthey my god, they just can't stop themselves
@janneke @davidgerard @mttaggart See, the thing is that I think that's exactly the takeaway from reading the post in earnest.
@davidgerard @mttaggart I mean yes, I already agree with needing to be harder on the output of this tech; if you look at my timeline, it's mostly filled with me being harsh on the state of things.
That said, I've seen several people who got radicalized *into* AI stuff by being in a position of assuming the current outputs can't be positioned to accomplish certain things they can, with massive guardrails put up. But the point is that those guardrails are not sustainable, because the very pattern of use tears down your ability to sustain them. And I think this blogpost does a good job of helping someone who isn't caught up on the state of things know what they can do, but also start to see why that isn't a sustainable pattern. But you have to read the whole post for it; the risk is that people just read the top half, and don't digest what I consider to be the significant part of it, that these tools pipeline you away from their necessary guardrails into being a vibecoder.
@davidgerard @mttaggart Where does it say the critics are the nutters
@davidgerard I really don't think that's an accurate read at all nor reflective of @mttaggart's beliefs
@trwnh @ammaratef45 @passngrin Yes but you need to know what the root is to bring it back