Fediverso
Discussioni sul Fediverso, il protocollo ActivityPub, le piattaforme social federate e relative applicazioni.
This category can be followed from the open social web via the handle fediverso@forum.pierobosio.it
793
Topics
4.5k
Posts
-
-
-
-
-
We’ve just added new profile tags ✨'n👑 Administrator and 🛡️ Moderator tags are now displayed on user profiles.'n💎 Supporter (available to our wonderful patrons) can now be enabled in account settings if you’d like to show your support publicly.
1
-
-
-
BIG PEERTUBE CO-OP UPDATE:'n'nLast night, I interviewed the final steering committee candidate.'n'nAnd just like that—it’s official.
1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
I love the Fediverse so much that @feline tattooed it on my arm 👀😍 ⁂'n#Fediverse #FediverseSymbol #tattoo
3
-
-
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
Warm up the fire! We're LIVE!
Summer in Winter: Norcal Gma 2's Journey with her Dog - E79
#owncast #streaming #interview #fediverse #fedi #people #show #firesidefedi #FsF
-
@benpate Yes, that’s exactly the gap I’m aiming at: the case where the old server is gone, hostile, or unavailable, and the user needs some way to carry forward verifiable account state without relying on that server’s cooperation.
My reading is that LOLA covers the cooperative portability path well, while this harsher failure case still needs more work. I don’t see PortaFed as a competing standard so much as a possible building block for that scenario.
-
@PortaFed ~ do you think these ideas would work alongside the existing work being done by the W3C social web community group? https://swicg.github.io/activitypub-data-portability/lola
I *think* you're solving the issue of "my server disappeared, I don't have a backup, and I can't prove I'm still me." Is this close?
Because that's the one use case that the portability spec DOESN'T do. So, maybe there's a way for us to work together, instead of making competing standards.
-
-
Bravo! I like the idea, and honestly I was thinking of making something similar myself. Maybe I’ll implement it into my platform.
-
@julian @julian@activitypub.social Yes, fair question and you deserve a direct answer.
The README and proposal documentation were drafted with AI assistance
(Claude/Anthropic) and then reviewed and edited by me. The cryptographic
design ed25519 keypairs, JCS/RFC 8785 canonicalisation, Merkle
construction, MigrationProof signing input is my own technical work.The Rust code in portafed-core implements real cryptographic primitives
and passes real tests. It is not generated boilerplate.
-
I can confirm that #Tuba is an excellent #Fediverse client for Linux and BSD users on #snac2. It's also great for Mastodon, #GoToSocial, etc.
-
Something we need. Looks to be NLNet funded? The README looks to be AI written, it contains a lot of the confident triple-statements often found in LLM-generated content. I hope that is as far as it goes because this might be brushing up against NLNet's generative AI policy: https://nlnet.nl/foundation/policies/generativeAI/
@portafed@mastodon.social may I ask whether LLM was used in the production of this project/code?
