@janantosWell, in that case, the doctor made the exact opposite prescription, but the transcription was altered by the transcribing assistant.If there are experienced reviewers (not just in medicine) who can invest considerable time and focus into cross-checking outputs, the worst can be prevented. But the effort that goes into such reviews was the cost factor that they wanted to eliminate, in the first place.Its nothing short of amazing that in a domain where even the tiniest of devices is regulated to death, to prevent harm, an try-and-error approach is followed with respect to the introduction of "AI".Safeguarding this via higher demands on already stressed MDs, and holding them accountable for catching all errors they didn't even make themselves, is not sustainable, IMHO. For me, that's way too risky.@RachelThornSub @EUCommission
