Did the #FediBuzz relay stop working for anyone who upgraded to Mastodon 4.5?
Technical Discussion
10
Posts
5
Posters
25
Views
-
Did the #FediBuzz relay stop working for anyone who upgraded to Mastodon 4.5? If that's the case I need to find a Rust implementation of RFC9421 ASAP: https://docs.joinmastodon.org/spec/security/#http-message-signatures
-
Did the #FediBuzz relay stop working for anyone who upgraded to Mastodon 4.5? If that's the case I need to find a Rust implementation of RFC9421 ASAP: https://docs.joinmastodon.org/spec/security/#http-message-signatures
This post is deleted! -
Did the #FediBuzz relay stop working for anyone who upgraded to Mastodon 4.5? If that's the case I need to find a Rust implementation of RFC9421 ASAP: https://docs.joinmastodon.org/spec/security/#http-message-signatures
astro@c3d2.social ooh are you a maintainer of FediBuzz?
-
This post is deleted!
@daniel the mainstream is not strong with you
-
Did the #FediBuzz relay stop working for anyone who upgraded to Mastodon 4.5? If that's the case I need to find a Rust implementation of RFC9421 ASAP: https://docs.joinmastodon.org/spec/security/#http-message-signatures
ok, we're still feeding fresh content to all the self-hosters :)
-
ok, we're still feeding fresh content to all the self-hosters :)
astro@c3d2.social fwiw Mastodon is supposed to have their upgraded signatures in a way that is backwards compatible with older clients... so incoming content from FediBuzz should still work.
That said, I'm looking to upgrade NodeBB to use the new signatures and I'm happy to debug against FediBuzz if you're interested.
... or even if you're not interested.
-
System shared this topic on
-
@daniel the mainstream is not strong with you
This post is deleted! -
Did the #FediBuzz relay stop working for anyone who upgraded to Mastodon 4.5? If that's the case I need to find a Rust implementation of RFC9421 ASAP: https://docs.joinmastodon.org/spec/security/#http-message-signatures
@astro I have a Rust implementation here: https://docs.rs/apx_core/latest/apx_core/
-
Did the #FediBuzz relay stop working for anyone who upgraded to Mastodon 4.5? If that's the case I need to find a Rust implementation of RFC9421 ASAP: https://docs.joinmastodon.org/spec/security/#http-message-signatures
@astro Howdy! I just noticed @tag-catsofmastodon and a few others I follow seem to have stopped working around January 13th, at least from what I can see at beige.party. But we're only on v4.4.9.
@theropologist, did you happen to do any system updates around 01/13/26?
-
@astro Howdy! I just noticed @tag-catsofmastodon and a few others I follow seem to have stopped working around January 13th, at least from what I can see at beige.party. But we're only on v4.4.9.
@theropologist, did you happen to do any system updates around 01/13/26?
@LibertyForward1 @theropologist I just disabled HTTP2 on my side. Fixed it?
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
imo social media and social networking are different things. mastodon is the former and doesn't need privacy. it's public and about going viral. encryption is needed for the latter. direct messaging and groups. #ActivityPub vs #matrix.
-
I use Mastodon DMs.
I want encryption, but there is something higher priority for me —
Being able to see ALL the DMs for a single user (that I have talked to) in a single place. Rather than having them scattered all over the place.
I get that these scattered DMs are the result of separate conversational threads, but — I would still like to see them all (from a single user) in one place.
-
RE: https://mastodon.social/@reiver/112133984854710390
"A guide to implement ActivityPub in a static site (or any website)" by @mapache
https://maho.dev/2024/02/a-guide-to-implement-activitypub-in-a-static-site-or-any-website/
-
Might bee a bug, I need to touch things regarding that
-
-
@julian @mario Yes, it supports both Add and Announce. However, wrapped activities are simply added to a conversation, there is no concept of "group" yet.
-
Is this what Mitra does now for 171b/1b12 cross-compatibility?
