I mean...
Senza categoria
2
Post
2
Autori
0
Visualizzazioni
-
I mean... Who wouldn't want this?
-
I mean... Who wouldn't want this?
@johnmark So, in your mind, what would interoperability between two protocols mean?
Feed RSS
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
@francina1909 vero. Avervi visto alle partire, ma non Mi avevano impressionato. Ma oggi...
-
In case anyone will be at the Open Source Conference in Luxembourg on the 1st of October, my talk is called "From Policy to Practice: Open Source and Digital Sovereignty in The Netherlands", it starts at 14:10. 🥳
-
@carlux Settimana prossima deve passare lo "spazzacamino" per controllare i camini, cos' poi son pronto per la studa a pellet ! Per il camino devo metter l'inserto in vetro tipo quello in foto, almeno sporca un filo meno !
-
-
@evan @wjmaggos ... but that's not what the question is asking. It's intent, and the #atproto and #activitypub in the question aren't referring to specifications, they're referring to communities.
-
@evan @wjmaggos you're reading it as a technologist – I agree with you that making atproto and activitypub literally interoperable is ... weird (although, I have argued many times that I think the two protocols will converge in functionality and scope, and also separately that lens-based translation of data structures is basically the best thing and would smooth right over the lexicon/AS differences if we had good tooling).
-
This post did not contain any content.
-
@blaine @wjmaggos The first question asked by the poll is "Would you like to see full default interoperability between #ATproto and #ActivityPub without a bridge?"
The second question is "what's preventing this".
Post suggeriti
-
-
Oggi pulizia e test di stufe e camini.camino: okstufa a pellet: rottastufa a legna: okVabbè, due su tre.
Senza categoria
1
-
@altbot A parte le simpatie e le antipatie per le scelte di vita passata , questo mio amico mi stimola coraggio e forza di volontà per uno scopo grande nella sua vita .
Senza categoria
3
-
