I added the ability to manage property values on users' profiles to #Enigmatick.
General Discussion
3
Posts
2
Posters
13
Views
-
I added the ability to manage property values on users' profiles to #Enigmatick. As I'm using this more as my full-time #Fediverse platform, I'm running into things that I've sort of blown off in the past as silly or unnecessary but finding useful now.
In this case, I implemented it using
AddandRemovemessages posted by the client (a single-page application in Svelte mediated by awasmmodule) to the user'soutboxon the server. TheActoris the target and thePropertyValueis theObject.It's not canonically how those #ActivityPub messages should be used (e.g., managing a
Collection- theattachmentfield on anActoris not really aCollection). But I think logically it makes sense. And it's client communication only; those activities are not federated. When a profile is updated via theAddorRemove, a separateUpdateis sent out to known servers to update the profile.Also, I may have gone a little overboard with my own properties.
-
I added the ability to manage property values on users' profiles to #Enigmatick. As I'm using this more as my full-time #Fediverse platform, I'm running into things that I've sort of blown off in the past as silly or unnecessary but finding useful now.
In this case, I implemented it using
AddandRemovemessages posted by the client (a single-page application in Svelte mediated by awasmmodule) to the user'soutboxon the server. TheActoris the target and thePropertyValueis theObject.It's not canonically how those #ActivityPub messages should be used (e.g., managing a
Collection- theattachmentfield on anActoris not really aCollection). But I think logically it makes sense. And it's client communication only; those activities are not federated. When a profile is updated via theAddorRemove, a separateUpdateis sent out to known servers to update the profile.Also, I may have gone a little overboard with my own properties.
@jdt very nice!
To what extent are you, or do you intent to, support the #ActivityPub #C2S parts of the spec? I am keeping track of a list of projects who do, at:
https://codeberg.org/fediverse/delightful-fediverse-experience/issues/130
-
@jdt very nice!
To what extent are you, or do you intent to, support the #ActivityPub #C2S parts of the spec? I am keeping track of a list of projects who do, at:
https://codeberg.org/fediverse/delightful-fediverse-experience/issues/130
@smallcircles@social.coop That's my plan. I don't use any kind of session management, so all authenticated actions use HTTP signatures generated by a dedicated client key provided by the
wasmmodule in the browser. I want to avoid any unique API calls as much as I can (although I do have a few right now).
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
@Edent embrace the diversity. 😜
-
Three different #ActivityPub spec guides - three different answers!
FEP-7628 says a Move has an ID, To, & CC.
https://codeberg.org/fediverse/fep/src/branch/main/fep/7628/fep-7628.mdSocialDocs says just an ID, no To nor CC.
https://socialdocs.org/docs/guides/account-migration/#the-move-activitySWICG says no ID, nor To, nor CC.
https://swicg.github.io/activitypub-data-portability/#process-0
-
The only bas part: posts would stay on old acc
-
You can do separate migrations, one at a time but yeah
-
@Edent It should work. But of course, there is a possibility of some popular implementation not being able to handle it.
-
@Edent - fun - just knowing this exists has me thinking of where to try it.
-
I mean, I see no reason why this wouldn't work. `alsoKnownAs` is an array of names.
I suppose if Alice is following both Bob and Chuck, then B & C are merged into Dave, she won't "double follow".
But I wonder if there are any other gotchas?
-
A question about #ActivityPub account migration.
Is it possible to use it to combine multiple accounts into one?
That is, can I `movedTo` all my old accounts to one new account, and set *several* `alsoKnownAs` on my new account's actor?
