Skip to content

Piero Bosio Social Web Site Personale Logo Fediverso

Social Forum federato con il resto del mondo. Non contano le istanze, contano le persone

Would an ActivityPub enabled fediverse alternative of Discord be possible?

Fediverse
20 14 45
  • There seems to be a serious lack of a Discord equivalent fediverse platform unlike other social media alternatives. Most of the closest options are either too overwhelming in UI/UX for majority of people coming from Discord, missing deal-breaking features like video calling or are not federated.

    Could it due to some technical limitation of the ActivityPub protocol? I skimmed through its documentation and I get the impression that content may not be accommodating of instant messaging without unconventional modifications. It would also be troublesome to federate massive bunch of messages across (physical) servers in real time.

    If it were truly possible to create a Discord alternative, what would it take to make it compatible with the fediverse while also ensuring it feels functional and intuitive for migrating users and not pose too much of a resource drain for self hosters?

    Edit: Modified title to clarify post talking about ActivityPub in particular

  • There seems to be a serious lack of a Discord equivalent fediverse platform unlike other social media alternatives. Most of the closest options are either too overwhelming in UI/UX for majority of people coming from Discord, missing deal-breaking features like video calling or are not federated.

    Could it due to some technical limitation of the ActivityPub protocol? I skimmed through its documentation and I get the impression that content may not be accommodating of instant messaging without unconventional modifications. It would also be troublesome to federate massive bunch of messages across (physical) servers in real time.

    If it were truly possible to create a Discord alternative, what would it take to make it compatible with the fediverse while also ensuring it feels functional and intuitive for migrating users and not pose too much of a resource drain for self hosters?

    Edit: Modified title to clarify post talking about ActivityPub in particular

    Just fyi there is matrix which is federated but it doesn't use activity pub protocol and it's not directly a drop in replacement discord. Voice/ video/ screen sharing aren't quite on the same level as discord.

  • There seems to be a serious lack of a Discord equivalent fediverse platform unlike other social media alternatives. Most of the closest options are either too overwhelming in UI/UX for majority of people coming from Discord, missing deal-breaking features like video calling or are not federated.

    Could it due to some technical limitation of the ActivityPub protocol? I skimmed through its documentation and I get the impression that content may not be accommodating of instant messaging without unconventional modifications. It would also be troublesome to federate massive bunch of messages across (physical) servers in real time.

    If it were truly possible to create a Discord alternative, what would it take to make it compatible with the fediverse while also ensuring it feels functional and intuitive for migrating users and not pose too much of a resource drain for self hosters?

    Edit: Modified title to clarify post talking about ActivityPub in particular

    What about Matrix and XMPP?

  • There seems to be a serious lack of a Discord equivalent fediverse platform unlike other social media alternatives. Most of the closest options are either too overwhelming in UI/UX for majority of people coming from Discord, missing deal-breaking features like video calling or are not federated.

    Could it due to some technical limitation of the ActivityPub protocol? I skimmed through its documentation and I get the impression that content may not be accommodating of instant messaging without unconventional modifications. It would also be troublesome to federate massive bunch of messages across (physical) servers in real time.

    If it were truly possible to create a Discord alternative, what would it take to make it compatible with the fediverse while also ensuring it feels functional and intuitive for migrating users and not pose too much of a resource drain for self hosters?

    Edit: Modified title to clarify post talking about ActivityPub in particular

    Isn't that Matrix?

    ActivityPub wouldn't work because it's not a messaging protocol. It's a publishing protocol. The closest thing you have is Lemmy- where you have a server (instance) with channels (communities).

    It'll be easier to achieve something like this using SMTP (email protocol) than with ActivityPub.

    Matrix and XMPP are your best bets (although XMPP doesn't necessarily natively have video call, usually you'll have an accompanying TURN server)

    What you can do with email, xmpp and the fediverse is have the same username. It is possible for someone to make a platform which gives you one name and it accepts email, xmpp and fedi. Unfortunately, Matrix, for some strange reason uses the format of @name:server instead of the standard name@server (activitypub might use @name@server but that's close enough and a lot of lemmy frontends don't even care for the initial @. In reality that initial @ is probably just being used to ping them, now realising.)

  • There seems to be a serious lack of a Discord equivalent fediverse platform unlike other social media alternatives. Most of the closest options are either too overwhelming in UI/UX for majority of people coming from Discord, missing deal-breaking features like video calling or are not federated.

    Could it due to some technical limitation of the ActivityPub protocol? I skimmed through its documentation and I get the impression that content may not be accommodating of instant messaging without unconventional modifications. It would also be troublesome to federate massive bunch of messages across (physical) servers in real time.

    If it were truly possible to create a Discord alternative, what would it take to make it compatible with the fediverse while also ensuring it feels functional and intuitive for migrating users and not pose too much of a resource drain for self hosters?

    Edit: Modified title to clarify post talking about ActivityPub in particular

    Is Discord social media? Social sure, but not media really.
    It always seemed to be more a live communication/chat app to me.

  • There seems to be a serious lack of a Discord equivalent fediverse platform unlike other social media alternatives. Most of the closest options are either too overwhelming in UI/UX for majority of people coming from Discord, missing deal-breaking features like video calling or are not federated.

    Could it due to some technical limitation of the ActivityPub protocol? I skimmed through its documentation and I get the impression that content may not be accommodating of instant messaging without unconventional modifications. It would also be troublesome to federate massive bunch of messages across (physical) servers in real time.

    If it were truly possible to create a Discord alternative, what would it take to make it compatible with the fediverse while also ensuring it feels functional and intuitive for migrating users and not pose too much of a resource drain for self hosters?

    Edit: Modified title to clarify post talking about ActivityPub in particular

    Discord has both private and public channels. I won't bother considering their threaded discussion offerings, because they're absolutely horrendous.

    ActivityPub is primarily public. You have scoped visibility that enables things like private messaging, but there is no implementation that allows for federated private group discussions.

    There are proposals and a few implementations, but they all rely on everybody else to implement the same proposal, otherwise messages leak out, and that defeats the entire assumption of the private group.

    It's not an unsolvable problem, merely one that hasn't been successfully solved yet.

    As for whether AP is a good fit... It'll work. At the end of the day you're exchanging messages. Whether they're long form or chat messages makes little difference.

  • Isn't that Matrix?

    ActivityPub wouldn't work because it's not a messaging protocol. It's a publishing protocol. The closest thing you have is Lemmy- where you have a server (instance) with channels (communities).

    It'll be easier to achieve something like this using SMTP (email protocol) than with ActivityPub.

    Matrix and XMPP are your best bets (although XMPP doesn't necessarily natively have video call, usually you'll have an accompanying TURN server)

    What you can do with email, xmpp and the fediverse is have the same username. It is possible for someone to make a platform which gives you one name and it accepts email, xmpp and fedi. Unfortunately, Matrix, for some strange reason uses the format of @name:server instead of the standard name@server (activitypub might use @name@server but that's close enough and a lot of lemmy frontends don't even care for the initial @. In reality that initial @ is probably just being used to ping them, now realising.)

    Matrix just isn't up to it. It doesn't function the same really. It doesn't feel the same.

  • Isn't that Matrix?

    ActivityPub wouldn't work because it's not a messaging protocol. It's a publishing protocol. The closest thing you have is Lemmy- where you have a server (instance) with channels (communities).

    It'll be easier to achieve something like this using SMTP (email protocol) than with ActivityPub.

    Matrix and XMPP are your best bets (although XMPP doesn't necessarily natively have video call, usually you'll have an accompanying TURN server)

    What you can do with email, xmpp and the fediverse is have the same username. It is possible for someone to make a platform which gives you one name and it accepts email, xmpp and fedi. Unfortunately, Matrix, for some strange reason uses the format of @name:server instead of the standard name@server (activitypub might use @name@server but that's close enough and a lot of lemmy frontends don't even care for the initial @. In reality that initial @ is probably just being used to ping them, now realising.)

    although XMPP doesn’t necessarily natively have video call, usually you’ll have an accompanying TURN server

    The same is true for Matrix and the popular Ejabberd xmpp server has a Stun/Turn server built in, which makes it even easier to setup than what you have on Matrix.

    P.S.: Matrix also isn't a messaging protocol. It is a distributed database protocol that has been abused for making a messenger with it.

  • Matrix just isn't up to it. It doesn't function the same really. It doesn't feel the same.

    You can't choose what order channels are in, for one thing

  • Matrix just isn't up to it. It doesn't function the same really. It doesn't feel the same.

    That might not be a bad thing. I hate Discord. That might come due to its usage though. It's just not made to organize technical support.

  • That might not be a bad thing. I hate Discord. That might come due to its usage though. It's just not made to organize technical support.

    Well yes, that's the problem. Matrix is just used for tech/troubleshoot issues and it's buggy as hell.

    It isn't a social experience like discord. It is a gap in the fediverse

  • There seems to be a serious lack of a Discord equivalent fediverse platform unlike other social media alternatives. Most of the closest options are either too overwhelming in UI/UX for majority of people coming from Discord, missing deal-breaking features like video calling or are not federated.

    Could it due to some technical limitation of the ActivityPub protocol? I skimmed through its documentation and I get the impression that content may not be accommodating of instant messaging without unconventional modifications. It would also be troublesome to federate massive bunch of messages across (physical) servers in real time.

    If it were truly possible to create a Discord alternative, what would it take to make it compatible with the fediverse while also ensuring it feels functional and intuitive for migrating users and not pose too much of a resource drain for self hosters?

    Edit: Modified title to clarify post talking about ActivityPub in particular

    It's totally possible to make a true 1-1 competitor to Discord but no one has done it yet.

    Nextcloud Talk is probably the closest thing with federation. But Nextcloud is notoriously complicated to host. And for some reason super unpopular outside of Europe.

    Stoat (formerly Revolt) is very close, both in functionality and UI. But is not federated (and has no plans to) and for some reason not very popular. Also doesn't come with the wealth of configuration and moderation tools that Discord does.

    Matrix works but it's super slow, bug-ridden, and complicated to use.

    Zulip is similar but I've used it fairly extensively and still have no idea WTF is happening. Also not federated.

    Of course there's always IRC and whatever other ancient comms tools that still work fine but are very dated and lack functionality.

  • Matrix just isn't up to it. It doesn't function the same really. It doesn't feel the same.

    In what ways?

  • It's totally possible to make a true 1-1 competitor to Discord but no one has done it yet.

    Nextcloud Talk is probably the closest thing with federation. But Nextcloud is notoriously complicated to host. And for some reason super unpopular outside of Europe.

    Stoat (formerly Revolt) is very close, both in functionality and UI. But is not federated (and has no plans to) and for some reason not very popular. Also doesn't come with the wealth of configuration and moderation tools that Discord does.

    Matrix works but it's super slow, bug-ridden, and complicated to use.

    Zulip is similar but I've used it fairly extensively and still have no idea WTF is happening. Also not federated.

    Of course there's always IRC and whatever other ancient comms tools that still work fine but are very dated and lack functionality.

    The Stoat development cycle is really, really slow. This is why it's just fallen away.

  • Its buggy, it just doesn't really look like Discord. It is a chore for new users to use. There's no useful community discovery.

  • Its buggy, it just doesn't really look like Discord. It is a chore for new users to use. There's no useful community discovery.

    Don’t go looking for a 1 to 1 drop in. That mindset won’t work much. Same case wit expecting windows to work the same as windows: they’re just different and have to be learned in their own ways.

  • Is Discord social media? Social sure, but not media really.
    It always seemed to be more a live communication/chat app to me.

    Many people use it as forums.

  • Don’t go looking for a 1 to 1 drop in. That mindset won’t work much. Same case wit expecting windows to work the same as windows: they’re just different and have to be learned in their own ways.

    Right, but it almost doesn't matter because no-one is actually using matrix in the same way they might use Discord. It just isn't being used socially for hobbies and interests and a part of that is it's design and bugs and tedium getting set up.

  • It's totally possible to make a true 1-1 competitor to Discord but no one has done it yet.

    Nextcloud Talk is probably the closest thing with federation. But Nextcloud is notoriously complicated to host. And for some reason super unpopular outside of Europe.

    Stoat (formerly Revolt) is very close, both in functionality and UI. But is not federated (and has no plans to) and for some reason not very popular. Also doesn't come with the wealth of configuration and moderation tools that Discord does.

    Matrix works but it's super slow, bug-ridden, and complicated to use.

    Zulip is similar but I've used it fairly extensively and still have no idea WTF is happening. Also not federated.

    Of course there's always IRC and whatever other ancient comms tools that still work fine but are very dated and lack functionality.

    Nextcloud talk has federation?

  • Many people use it as forums.

    Except it's completely gated behind Discord corporate servers, unsearchable outside of Discord, and all ownership lies with... you guessed it, Discord.

    But oooh aah Nitro....


Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
Post suggeriti
  • 0 Votes
    2 Posts
    8 Views
    LieferTour mit AusBlick 🌳🌲🎄#hotzenwald #Logistik #mobilität neuHandeln #fediverse to #blueSky
  • 0 Votes
    2 Posts
    4 Views
    https://michiyospace.altervista.org/un-anno-nel-fediverso-la-calma-che-ti-cambia-la-testa/
  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    11 Views
    The major feature in v3.2.0 of Ktistec is thread analysis. The previous release, v3.1.2, added support for viewing threads from Lemmy communities. I follow the Open Source community, which leads to many large threads. The thread on FFMpeg and Google has 112 posts and is still growing.Thread analysis helps me navigate these extensive conversations. It includes: top contributors, a timeline histogram, and notable branches.The analysis applies several heuristics to identify interesting branches of the main thread. “Interesting” is subjective, but the algorithm currently looks for sudden bursts of activity and highlights those areas. Ktistec uses this to create a table of contents that links directly to those branches. Clicking on one of these links takes you to a branch-only view that focuses on the selected part of the thread.It's fast—I anticipated needing to cache analyses, but analyzing a thread with over 400 posts takes only about 50 milliseconds on my production server.Figure 1: Screenshot of the final design. Notable branches link to subsets of the thread.This release also addresses an object visibility regression that was introduced in a previous version.Full ChangelogAddedThread analysis that displays key participants, a timeline histogram, and notable branchesNew MCP tools: analyze_thread and get_threadFocal point rendering support for image attachmentsFixedRegression in object visibility affecting replies to threadsChangedEnhanced MCP tool details for likes, dislikes, and announcesImproved cookie security.#ktistec #fediverse #activitypub #crystallang
  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    25 Views
    Hey everyone,While @joynewacc’s Internet connection is offline during her move, I was lucky enough to have @aseelfromgz with me today as we carried out today’s verification video calls for Gaza Verified and we’re happy to welcome four new accounts/families to Gaza Verified.They are:• Mohamed Hesham – @mohamedhesham• Naeema family – @naeemafamily• Hema Alshaer – @hemaalshaer• Seraj Alnajjar – @serajnjar20Please give them a warm welcome to Mastodon and the fediverse, follow their accounts, and, if you can, please help them with their fundraisers and please share this so others might also.Also, please remember that Aseel is in Gaza too and is helping others despite facing the very same challenges herself. You can help her and her family via her:• PayPal (easier for them to get the funds): https://www.paypal.com/donate/?hosted_button_id=7DTFU9TQV44EY• GoFundMe: https://www.gofundme.com/f/help-aseel-and-family-leave-gaza-before-its-too-late/💕#Gaza #Palestine #GazaVerified #Mastodon #fediverse #newMembers #verification