๐ฃ Opinions are welcome ๐ฃ
-
๐ฃ Opinions are welcome ๐ฃ
Imagine we set up a national codeplatform to replace GitHub. Aka a self-hosted platform where all Dutch gov workers can store, collaborate and build gov code, with as many features as possible (also on the admin side) and respecting digital sovereignty.
Would you want it to be... (comments are welcome!)
@Gina voted for GitLab mostly because I have direct experience with it and I have none with Forgejo. Also I could be wrong but it seems to be more mature.
Itโs really a hard question though. One is backed by a company which could always turn. But itโs also a lot more likely to be around and actively developed in 15 years (IMO).
Iโve self hosted GitLab CE (and more recently upgraded to EE for one feature which I donโt remember) for over 10 years and have no complaints.
-
-
๐ฃ Opinions are welcome ๐ฃ
Imagine we set up a national codeplatform to replace GitHub. Aka a self-hosted platform where all Dutch gov workers can store, collaborate and build gov code, with as many features as possible (also on the admin side) and respecting digital sovereignty.
Would you want it to be... (comments are welcome!)
@Gina we've been using GitLab community edition internally at the City of #CapeTown for about 7 years, and it's worked well for us, without any of the paid for features.
I think a big question is how much of the project management stuff is core vs *nice to have* - do you need just git + a code review platform, vs git + code reviews + an internal Jira, too?
I've been fairly surprised how effective/under developed the idea of issue management has been in our context, so GL has worked for that
-
๐ฃ Opinions are welcome ๐ฃ
Imagine we set up a national codeplatform to replace GitHub. Aka a self-hosted platform where all Dutch gov workers can store, collaborate and build gov code, with as many features as possible (also on the admin side) and respecting digital sovereignty.
Would you want it to be... (comments are welcome!)
@Gina Voted Gitlab, no issues with it personally and it's more well-known. Both look like good options though.
-
๐ฃ Opinions are welcome ๐ฃ
Imagine we set up a national codeplatform to replace GitHub. Aka a self-hosted platform where all Dutch gov workers can store, collaborate and build gov code, with as many features as possible (also on the admin side) and respecting digital sovereignty.
Would you want it to be... (comments are welcome!)
Why not use (and fund) Codeberg? It's already established and has a user base and it's located in the EU.
-
Why not use (and fund) Codeberg? It's already established and has a user base and it's located in the EU.
@suetanvil we need our own self-hosted codeplatform. Forgejo is what Codeberg uses.
-
-
-
๐ฃ Opinions are welcome ๐ฃ
Imagine we set up a national codeplatform to replace GitHub. Aka a self-hosted platform where all Dutch gov workers can store, collaborate and build gov code, with as many features as possible (also on the admin side) and respecting digital sovereignty.
Would you want it to be... (comments are welcome!)
@Gina
Proud to be a part of the community that votes like this. -
๐ฃ Opinions are welcome ๐ฃ
Imagine we set up a national codeplatform to replace GitHub. Aka a self-hosted platform where all Dutch gov workers can store, collaborate and build gov code, with as many features as possible (also on the admin side) and respecting digital sovereignty.
Would you want it to be... (comments are welcome!)
@Gina So, I might be repeating what has been said, but as someone who ran both (Gitlab on corporate and Forgejo for personal projects), I'd say Gitlab has more of the bells and whistles to handle complex projects. Especially for project planning, it has been great even at the free version.
However, because of the ethical merits and federation of Forgejo, perhaps its a good idea to discuss with Forgejo devs and fund some more enterprise features?