See, this — •this• — is what ICE+CBP are actually for under this regime.
-
See, this — •this• — is what ICE+CBP are actually for under this regime. •This• is why they got a budget the size of Russia’s entire military.
It’s nothing to do with immigration. It’s about the would-be dictator having his own private military that:
- can be deployed domestically
- at will
- unbeholden to the UCMJ etc
- or disciplined military culture
- or any accountability whatsoever
- with unpredictably violent behavior
- applied indiscriminately
- to anyone
- so that the entire population is terrified of it…because for them, the problem with Jan 6 was that the coup wasn’t violent enough and didn’t have enough weapons.
-
See, this — •this• — is what ICE+CBP are actually for under this regime. •This• is why they got a budget the size of Russia’s entire military.
It’s nothing to do with immigration. It’s about the would-be dictator having his own private military that:
- can be deployed domestically
- at will
- unbeholden to the UCMJ etc
- or disciplined military culture
- or any accountability whatsoever
- with unpredictably violent behavior
- applied indiscriminately
- to anyone
- so that the entire population is terrified of it…because for them, the problem with Jan 6 was that the coup wasn’t violent enough and didn’t have enough weapons.
This budget battle over DHS that’s happening in the Senate now — it’s not about accountability or guard rails. It’s about whether a force like this should exist at all in the USA.
-
See, this — •this• — is what ICE+CBP are actually for under this regime. •This• is why they got a budget the size of Russia’s entire military.
It’s nothing to do with immigration. It’s about the would-be dictator having his own private military that:
- can be deployed domestically
- at will
- unbeholden to the UCMJ etc
- or disciplined military culture
- or any accountability whatsoever
- with unpredictably violent behavior
- applied indiscriminately
- to anyone
- so that the entire population is terrified of it…because for them, the problem with Jan 6 was that the coup wasn’t violent enough and didn’t have enough weapons.
-
@trochee
That is the correct reaction, yes. -
See, this — •this• — is what ICE+CBP are actually for under this regime. •This• is why they got a budget the size of Russia’s entire military.
It’s nothing to do with immigration. It’s about the would-be dictator having his own private military that:
- can be deployed domestically
- at will
- unbeholden to the UCMJ etc
- or disciplined military culture
- or any accountability whatsoever
- with unpredictably violent behavior
- applied indiscriminately
- to anyone
- so that the entire population is terrified of it…because for them, the problem with Jan 6 was that the coup wasn’t violent enough and didn’t have enough weapons.
-
@trochee
That is the correct reaction, yes.Also, this guy makes Pontius Pilate look like a mensch
-
See, this — •this• — is what ICE+CBP are actually for under this regime. •This• is why they got a budget the size of Russia’s entire military.
It’s nothing to do with immigration. It’s about the would-be dictator having his own private military that:
- can be deployed domestically
- at will
- unbeholden to the UCMJ etc
- or disciplined military culture
- or any accountability whatsoever
- with unpredictably violent behavior
- applied indiscriminately
- to anyone
- so that the entire population is terrified of it…because for them, the problem with Jan 6 was that the coup wasn’t violent enough and didn’t have enough weapons.
It is a crime for the media to not constantly describe Bannon as "Epstein's best bud"
-
This budget battle over DHS that’s happening in the Senate now — it’s not about accountability or guard rails. It’s about whether a force like this should exist at all in the USA.
@inthehands Unfortunately, it seems at least too many elected dems still think it should exist.
Some have joined the 'abolish ICE' calls, but, I don't think enough reps or senators are taking it seriously.
Yet.
Some have changed stances - public pressure matters.
Especially when it's backed up by strikes, disruptive protests, etc.
So, it's not hopeless - but I don't think most of the senate, is seriously considering 'abolish' as an option. [hopefully primaries will be a slaugghter over it] -
undefined filobus@sociale.network shared this topic