Skip to content

Piero Bosio Social Web Site Personale Logo Fediverso

Social Forum federato con il resto del mondo. Non contano le istanze, contano le persone

UPDATE: A blog (that is federated) was created for communicate the progress, follow @badgefed

General Discussion
9 3 25
  • UPDATE: A blog (that is federated) was created for communicate the progress, follow @badgefed

    --

    I am creating a minimalistic implementation of a badge system similar to Credly, built using and leveraging the

    I have issued a first badge, the idea is to decentralize the verification systems, and allow organizations to self-certify. It is incredible that organizations like Microsoft or Non-Profits pay thousands of dollars to companies like Pearson to just provide "verified" badges. Similar to mastodons installed in social-dot-something, thinkg of badges<dot> mozilla<dot>com , certifications<dot>myschooldistrict<dot>com. Or even a podcast emitting a badge for its guests, with the verification in the domain.

    ActivityPub already offers a secure way to sign artifacts and interact between actors. The fediverse already have people with profiles, a social graph as @mike says, ready to use. Think of how LetsEncrypt disrupted that market of few actors selling certificates for websites.

    I have a functional poc,
    @fediverse is not a mastodon, pledora or blog, it is an actor in a badge system, but you can follow it in Mastodon. Its badges will show in but they are not notes or articles. If you want to learn more, follow me, I will be sharing the progress here. Or follow the github project here: https://github.com/tryvocalcat/activitypub-badges

    Who wants a badge of early adopter?

  • UPDATE: A blog (that is federated) was created for communicate the progress, follow @badgefed

    --

    I am creating a minimalistic implementation of a badge system similar to Credly, built using and leveraging the

    I have issued a first badge, the idea is to decentralize the verification systems, and allow organizations to self-certify. It is incredible that organizations like Microsoft or Non-Profits pay thousands of dollars to companies like Pearson to just provide "verified" badges. Similar to mastodons installed in social-dot-something, thinkg of badges<dot> mozilla<dot>com , certifications<dot>myschooldistrict<dot>com. Or even a podcast emitting a badge for its guests, with the verification in the domain.

    ActivityPub already offers a secure way to sign artifacts and interact between actors. The fediverse already have people with profiles, a social graph as @mike says, ready to use. Think of how LetsEncrypt disrupted that market of few actors selling certificates for websites.

    I have a functional poc,
    @fediverse is not a mastodon, pledora or blog, it is an actor in a badge system, but you can follow it in Mastodon. Its badges will show in but they are not notes or articles. If you want to learn more, follow me, I will be sharing the progress here. Or follow the github project here: https://github.com/tryvocalcat/activitypub-badges

    Who wants a badge of early adopter?

    the first badge and activitypub object, you can copy/paste the url and "open in mastodon" and will show as a note: https://badges.vocalcat.com/record/10

    as with other activitypub implementations the idea is that you celebrate, comment, share the badge inside your activitypub client, e.g. mastodon!

    Furthermore, think of a decentralized system, where the credentials get "federated", so different badges instances will recognize notes that are "certificates" issued by other instances. Now, if your certificate issuer disappear, well, the certificate is already decentralized, talk about survivability as the last episode of @Flipboard !

  • the first badge and activitypub object, you can copy/paste the url and "open in mastodon" and will show as a note: https://badges.vocalcat.com/record/10

    as with other activitypub implementations the idea is that you celebrate, comment, share the badge inside your activitypub client, e.g. mastodon!

    Furthermore, think of a decentralized system, where the credentials get "federated", so different badges instances will recognize notes that are "certificates" issued by other instances. Now, if your certificate issuer disappear, well, the certificate is already decentralized, talk about survivability as the last episode of @Flipboard !

    I gave a little bit of thinking on the changes I want to do to before making my server public.

    The one who emits the badges, is a actor, this should be no controversial, after all, I use the public/private keys to sign the badges itself.

    But in the first prototype the recipient of the grant, was a record in the system itself. The idea was to allow recipients outside the fediverse to receive badges as well. I did not wanted to store the email, so I required a profile url, think of your fediverse url, or for those outside , , even if they want. However, it gets things a little bit more complex and less clean than what I want.

    Today, I decided that the recipient MUST be an actor of the . That is, it, that will be embedded as a mention, and should be clean and neat. For those who are not in the fediverse, will provide an actor (and profile url) where they can add basic information such name, and bio links. Or they can create an account in any of the fediverse platforms at the moment of receiving the badge.

  • UPDATE: A blog (that is federated) was created for communicate the progress, follow @badgefed

    --

    I am creating a minimalistic implementation of a badge system similar to Credly, built using and leveraging the

    I have issued a first badge, the idea is to decentralize the verification systems, and allow organizations to self-certify. It is incredible that organizations like Microsoft or Non-Profits pay thousands of dollars to companies like Pearson to just provide "verified" badges. Similar to mastodons installed in social-dot-something, thinkg of badges<dot> mozilla<dot>com , certifications<dot>myschooldistrict<dot>com. Or even a podcast emitting a badge for its guests, with the verification in the domain.

    ActivityPub already offers a secure way to sign artifacts and interact between actors. The fediverse already have people with profiles, a social graph as @mike says, ready to use. Think of how LetsEncrypt disrupted that market of few actors selling certificates for websites.

    I have a functional poc,
    @fediverse is not a mastodon, pledora or blog, it is an actor in a badge system, but you can follow it in Mastodon. Its badges will show in but they are not notes or articles. If you want to learn more, follow me, I will be sharing the progress here. Or follow the github project here: https://github.com/tryvocalcat/activitypub-badges

    Who wants a badge of early adopter?

    @mapache @mike @fediverse @badgefed Would love the early adopter since they are still available; Love the project, as an event organizer I was looking for a badge emitter to give badges to volunteers as another aspect of saying thank you. Are you planning to make a Matrix chat or something so people could help each other out with their own servers? I'm struggling with random "Error creating actor: Invalid URI: The hostname could not be parsed." on my private instance and got stuck

  • @mapache @mike @fediverse @badgefed Would love the early adopter since they are still available; Love the project, as an event organizer I was looking for a badge emitter to give badges to volunteers as another aspect of saying thank you. Are you planning to make a Matrix chat or something so people could help each other out with their own servers? I'm struggling with random "Error creating actor: Invalid URI: The hostname could not be parsed." on my private instance and got stuck

    @fajfer @mike @fediverse @badgefed what event management system are you using? I am interested in see how to do a closer integration.

  • UPDATE: A blog (that is federated) was created for communicate the progress, follow @badgefed

    --

    I am creating a minimalistic implementation of a badge system similar to Credly, built using and leveraging the

    I have issued a first badge, the idea is to decentralize the verification systems, and allow organizations to self-certify. It is incredible that organizations like Microsoft or Non-Profits pay thousands of dollars to companies like Pearson to just provide "verified" badges. Similar to mastodons installed in social-dot-something, thinkg of badges<dot> mozilla<dot>com , certifications<dot>myschooldistrict<dot>com. Or even a podcast emitting a badge for its guests, with the verification in the domain.

    ActivityPub already offers a secure way to sign artifacts and interact between actors. The fediverse already have people with profiles, a social graph as @mike says, ready to use. Think of how LetsEncrypt disrupted that market of few actors selling certificates for websites.

    I have a functional poc,
    @fediverse is not a mastodon, pledora or blog, it is an actor in a badge system, but you can follow it in Mastodon. Its badges will show in but they are not notes or articles. If you want to learn more, follow me, I will be sharing the progress here. Or follow the github project here: https://github.com/tryvocalcat/activitypub-badges

    Who wants a badge of early adopter?

    @mapache@hachyderm.io I may consider building out a plugin for Badgefed.

    Any chance you might consider using a new object type, e.g. Badge?

  • @julian absolutely, but I think I don't fully get it, could you elaborate?

  • @julian absolutely, but I think I don't fully get it, could you elaborate?

    @mapache@hachyderm.io from what I understand you're using the ActivityPub note for compatibility. I wonder if a custom object type might open more doors.

    Doesn't really matter, just thinking out loud 🙂

    Does BadgeFed have an API to create new badges? Or fetch badges?

  • @julian yes. BadgeFed has an API. But the concept is really simple, it is a Note (or Document) that has an attachment. The attachment is a property of the ActivityPub object usually used for videos or images. In this case the attachment includes a full OpenBadge object.

    The only restriction is that the Note attributed (activitypub actor) MUST be the url in the OpenBadge issuer (issuer = actor). Also the recipient url from the OpenBadge SHOULD be mentioned in the Note.

    With this simple mechanism you can pretty much create a compatible badge that can be decentralized with BadgeFed.


Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
Post suggeriti
  • 0 Votes
    13 Posts
    43 Views
    @julian@activitypub.space @julian@fietkau.social well, in theory, you can have private likes and public likes. misskey and pleroma do public likes. mastodon does private likes, but then shows them publicly if anyone asks the origin site. because addressing is just a suggestion, apparently ;)
  • 0 Votes
    22 Posts
    38 Views
    @AdamStuartSmith yes! But it will only show up if the post you added it to has likes or shares. That said, it will not work on the frontage, only on singular posts.
  • 0 Votes
    10 Posts
    50 Views
    Actually I was wrong, there is a context so thats fine. The problem is that audience should be a simple string but you are sending an error, thats why it fails. Anyway that field is optional, so you can leave it out and put the community in to or cc instead. julian No but still the field is mandatory (mainly because that hasnt caused any problems so far).
  • 0 Votes
    4 Posts
    22 Views
    @julian @box464 There's actually already an Android app that allows all this: Raccoon for Friendica (which actually also works for Mastodon).Raccoon for Friendica is a rather unique app, one I'm very fond of, because it perfectly illustrates how the best ideas come from the "contamination" of different environments. Here's an article about Raccoon that should be updated, which I wrote a few weeks after the app's beta release (launched in late August 2024)Raccoon for Friendica was developed by @akesiseli after he had already developed an Android client for Lemmy (Raccoon for Lemmy).When he focused on Friendica, he faced the problem of how to translate Friendica's ability to display group conversations into an app (they're quite visible on Friendica's web interface, though they don't have the clearest interface possible like Lemmy's or forum platforms like NodeBB and Discourse). He ported the "topic view" feature already present in Lemmy's apps to Friendica!Since Raccoon is an app that also works with Mastodon, @akesiseli attempted to "force" Mastodon to have the same interface, and after a few attempts, he succeeded perfectly.Raccoon for Friendica still has a few imperfections (search isn't 100% functional, it still doesn't handle resharing with quoting, and other minor glitches, and feed capture is still a bit slow compared to Tusky and Fedilab), but despite being just over a year old, it's a decidedly mature app. Most importantly, it offers group viewing features that no other app offers. And—trust me!—group viewing isn't the only new feature Raccoon has brought to a social media client!I hope the app's development continues well, although I'm a little concerned: the developer is a bit disappointed that almost no one uses his app... But this is mostly due to the fact that the app has a name that appeals to Friendica users (who are very few) and that even the most established apps for Mastodon suffer from competition from an "official" app!