The enormous elephant in the room regarding the increasing demands on our electricity grid is simply this: we don't actually _need_ AI.
-
The enormous elephant in the room regarding the increasing demands on our electricity grid is simply this: we don't actually _need_ AI. It's not in any way a public need for public good. It's a private and public want. If you turned off every major GAI tomorrow nothing would demonstrably change except for our power consumption would go down and nvidia's stock would crash.
-
undefined Elena Rossini ⁂ ha condiviso questa discussione
undefined Oblomov ha condiviso questa discussione
-
@tankgrrl @_elena Help to people with disability _is_ a public service IMHO. But, there's a but: to be a public service it should respect more ethics, sustainability, 100 percent unbiased.
For the rest, true: it is not a need. Although we should even wonder what is exactly "a need", going deep down, even Internet wouldn't be "a need" - not like water, and not like sleep or food. (1/2)Btw let me say: capitalism creates the problem (let's even say visual-based environment) and then builds the solution (AI able to describe images) (2/2)
-
The enormous elephant in the room regarding the increasing demands on our electricity grid is simply this: we don't actually _need_ AI. It's not in any way a public need for public good. It's a private and public want. If you turned off every major GAI tomorrow nothing would demonstrably change except for our power consumption would go down and nvidia's stock would crash.
@tankgrrl @_elena Help to people with disability _is_ a public service IMHO. But, there's a but: to be a public service it should respect more ethics, sustainability, 100 percent unbiased.
For the rest, true: it is not a need. Although we should even wonder what is exactly "a need", going deep down, even Internet wouldn't be "a need" - not like water, and not like sleep or food. (1/2)