Skip to content

Piero Bosio Social Web Site Personale Logo Fediverso

Social Forum federato con il resto del mondo. Non contano le istanze, contano le persone

Ben Jennings (Guardian) on the Tangerine Tyrants' (so-called) Board of Peace.

Uncategorized
22 21 60

Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
  • Chi esercita il DIRITTO di voto ha il DOVERE di informarsi.

    read more

  • @levelbot I feel good about myself and this number.

    read more

  • buckle up <-> buckle down axis

    read more

  • @reiver@mastodon.social knowing people in general... They will get more bug reports if they said "whom"

    read more

  • @reiver I've heard John Mastodon personally picks those out of a tall hat, for each user, individually. What a great man.

    read more

  • I'm writing this in English.

    Not because English is my first language—it isn't. I'm writing this in English because if I wrote it in Korean, the people I'm addressing would run it through an outdated translator, misread it, and respond to something I never said. The responsibility for that mistranslation would fall on me. It always does.

    This is the thing Eugen Rochko's post misses, despite its good intentions.

    @Gargron@mastodon.social argues that LLMs are no substitute for human translators, and that people who think otherwise don't actually rely on translation. He's right about some of this. A machine-translated novel is not the same as one rendered by a skilled human translator. But the argument rests on a premise that only makes sense from a certain position: that translation is primarily about quality, about the aesthetic experience of reading literature in another language.

    For many of us, translation is first about access.

    The professional translation market doesn't scale to cover everything. It never has. What gets translated—and into which languages—follows the logic of cultural hegemony. Works from dominant Western languages flow outward, translated into everything. Works from East Asian languages trickle in, selectively, slowly, on someone else's schedule. The asymmetry isn't incidental; it's structural.

    @Gargron@mastodon.social notes, fairly, that machine translation existed decades before LLMs. But this is only half the story, and which half matters depends entirely on which languages you're talking about. European language pairs were reasonably serviceable with older tools. Korean–English, Japanese–English, Chinese–English? Genuinely usable translation for these pairs arrived with the LLM era. Treating “machine translation” as a monolithic technology with a uniform history erases the experience of everyone whose language sits far from the Indo-European center.

    There's also something uncomfortable in the framing of the button-press thought experiment: “I would erase LLMs even if it took machine translation with it.” For someone whose language has always been peripheral, that button looks very different. It's not an abstract philosophical position; it's a statement about whose access to information is expendable.

    I want to be clear: none of this is an argument that LLMs are good, or that the harms @Gargron@mastodon.social describes aren't real. They are. But a critique of AI doesn't become more universal by ignoring whose languages have always been on the margins. If anything, a serious critique of AI's political economy should be more attentive to those asymmetries, not less.

    The fact that I'm writing this in English, carefully, so it won't be misread—that's not incidental to my argument. That is my argument.

    read more

  • I've been checking out @inkwell , the new journaling app on the Fediverse. It looks absolutely great. Fantastic work by @stanton. If you'd like to follow me there, check out @evan@inkwell.social.

    read more

  • There is the complete list that Mastodon is suggesting I (potentially) follow.

    read more
Post suggeriti
  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    4 Views
    It does give me hope for the future when I see polls like this. Reform UK have absolutely no place in politics and yet many of the older generation seem to have some very right wing views and want to put them there.Controlling our nation. Destroying our nation.I suspect these same people would happily see their non-white skinned neighbours taken by Reform ICE agents in the early hours of the morning - never to be seen again.I just question why there'd even consider voting Reform though, bearing in mind Reform are pretty much going to kill off the NHS - a service they may need more and more as they age.#reformuk #votingintention #politics
  • 0 Votes
    2 Posts
    5 Views
    @ScottStarkey This reminds me of a story that's surely made its rounds a couple times in internet circles about one of the most successful policy wins in the U.S.: Lead-acid battery recycling.Lead-acid batteries are huge environmental risks and addressing these risks means as close to 100% of lead-acid batteries need to be recycled or at least turned in and disposed of properly. Lead-acid batteries are almost entirely recyclable, the running wisdom being only the label on the outside and the paper-like material between the pieces of lead not being fully recyclable.Instead of attacking the problem by punishing or rewarding recycling, the law adds a core charge deposit to new batteries which is substantial to most folk but not outrageous - $22 I think these days. However, if you turn in an old battery at the same time you purchase a new one, that core charge is not applied (since you get the money back but it is immediately applied to the new battery). Further, if you return a battery but don't purchase a new one, you get $22 back.With this regulation, lead-acid batteries are some of the most recycled consumer components out there. Almost everyone wants to avoid the core charge and at the same time, is pleased when it works out in their favor when recycling or turning in a battery.I would say that this rule works because it was designed so people want to follow it, whether or not they like or know anything about the rule at all. The choices are clear and simple to everyone and it takes a lot for someone to be okay with missing out on $22. Further, if that old battery is ever found by anyone else, they immediately have a financial incentive to do the right thing.
  • 0 Votes
    1 Posts
    9 Views
    Guida agli interventi degli Stati Uniti in America Latina, pubblicata su: @attualita #USA #Trump #Sudamerica #venezuela #maduro #caracas #southamerica
  • 0 Votes
    2 Posts
    6 Views
    #Trump ordina la costruzione di due nuove #navi da guerra. Il difficile è stato convincerlo a non volerle arancione.