Unions are not perfect.
Uncategorized
10
Posts
1
Posters
0
Views
-
Unions are not perfect. Indeed, it is possible to belong to a union that is bad for workers: either because it is weak, or corrupt, or captured (or some combination of the three).
--
If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this thread to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:
https://pluralistic.net/2025/12/15/class-war-labor-peace/#workplace-democracy
1/
-
Unions are not perfect. Indeed, it is possible to belong to a union that is bad for workers: either because it is weak, or corrupt, or captured (or some combination of the three).
--
If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this thread to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:
https://pluralistic.net/2025/12/15/class-war-labor-peace/#workplace-democracy
1/
Take the "two-tier contract." As unions lost ground - thanks to changes in labor enforcement under a succession of both GOP and Dem administrations - labor bosses hit on a *suicidal* strategy for contract negotiations. Rather than bargaining for a single contract that covered all the union's dues-paying members, these bosses negotiated contracts that guaranteed benefits for *existing* members, but did not extend these benefits to *new* members:
https://pluralistic.net/2021/11/25/strikesgiving/#shed-a-tier
2/
-
Take the "two-tier contract." As unions lost ground - thanks to changes in labor enforcement under a succession of both GOP and Dem administrations - labor bosses hit on a *suicidal* strategy for contract negotiations. Rather than bargaining for a single contract that covered all the union's dues-paying members, these bosses negotiated contracts that guaranteed benefits for *existing* members, but did not extend these benefits to *new* members:
https://pluralistic.net/2021/11/25/strikesgiving/#shed-a-tier
2/
A two-tier contract is one where *all* workers pay dues, but only the dwindling rump of older, more established workers get any protection or representation from their union. An ever-larger portion of the membership have to pay dues, but get *nothing* for them. You couldn't come up with a better way to destroy unions if you tried.
3/
-
A two-tier contract is one where *all* workers pay dues, but only the dwindling rump of older, more established workers get any protection or representation from their union. An ever-larger portion of the membership have to pay dues, but get *nothing* for them. You couldn't come up with a better way to destroy unions if you tried.
3/
Thankfully, union workers figured out that the answer to this problem was firing their leaders and replacing them with militant, principled leaders who cared about *workers*, not just a subsection of their members. Radicals in big unions - like the UAW - teamed up with comrades from university grad students' unions to master the arcane rules that had been weaponized by corrupt bosses to prevent free and fair union elections.
4/
-
Thankfully, union workers figured out that the answer to this problem was firing their leaders and replacing them with militant, principled leaders who cared about *workers*, not just a subsection of their members. Radicals in big unions - like the UAW - teamed up with comrades from university grad students' unions to master the arcane rules that had been weaponized by corrupt bosses to prevent free and fair union elections.
4/
Together, they forced the first legitimate union elections in generations, and then the newly elected leaders ran historic strikes that won huge gains for workers (and killed the two-tier contract):
https://theintercept.com/2023/04/07/deconstructed-union-dhl-teamsters-uaw/
Corrupt unions aren't the only life-destroying institutions that radicals have set their sights on this decade. Concentrated corporate power is the most dangerous force in the world (indeed, it's large, powerful corporations that corrupted those unions).
5/
-
Together, they forced the first legitimate union elections in generations, and then the newly elected leaders ran historic strikes that won huge gains for workers (and killed the two-tier contract):
https://theintercept.com/2023/04/07/deconstructed-union-dhl-teamsters-uaw/
Corrupt unions aren't the only life-destroying institutions that radicals have set their sights on this decade. Concentrated corporate power is the most dangerous force in the world (indeed, it's large, powerful corporations that corrupted those unions).
5/
Antitrust activists, environmental activists, consumer rights activists, privacy activists and labor activists have stepped up the global war on big business all through this decade. From new antitrust laws to antitrust lawsuits to strikes to boycotts to mass protests and direct action, this decade has marked a turning point in the global consciousness about the danger of corporate power and the need to fight it.
6/
-
Antitrust activists, environmental activists, consumer rights activists, privacy activists and labor activists have stepped up the global war on big business all through this decade. From new antitrust laws to antitrust lawsuits to strikes to boycotts to mass protests and direct action, this decade has marked a turning point in the global consciousness about the danger of corporate power and the need to fight it.
6/
But there's a big, important difference between bad corporations and bad unions: what we should do about them.
The answer to a powerful, corrupt corporation is to take action that strips it of its power: break the company up, whack it with fines, take away its corporate charter, strip its executives of their fortunes, even put them in prison.
7/
-
But there's a big, important difference between bad corporations and bad unions: what we should do about them.
The answer to a powerful, corrupt corporation is to take action that strips it of its power: break the company up, whack it with fines, take away its corporate charter, strip its executives of their fortunes, even put them in prison.
7/
That's because corporations are foundationally undemocratic institutions, governed by "one share, one vote" (and the billionaires who benefit from corporate power are building a society that's "one dollar, one vote").
They fundamentally exist to consolidate power *at the expense* of workers, suppliers and customers, to extract wealth by imposing costs on the rest of us, from pollution to political corruption.
8/
-
That's because corporations are foundationally undemocratic institutions, governed by "one share, one vote" (and the billionaires who benefit from corporate power are building a society that's "one dollar, one vote").
They fundamentally exist to consolidate power *at the expense* of workers, suppliers and customers, to extract wealth by imposing costs on the rest of us, from pollution to political corruption.
8/
When a corporation gets big enough to pose a risk to societal wellbeing, we need to smash that corporation, not reform it.
But the answer to a corrupt union is to fire the union bosses and replace them with better ones. The mission of a union is foundationally *pro-democratic*. A unionized workplace is a democratic workplace. As in any democracy, workplace democracies can be led by bad or incompetent people.
9/
-
When a corporation gets big enough to pose a risk to societal wellbeing, we need to smash that corporation, not reform it.
But the answer to a corrupt union is to fire the union bosses and replace them with better ones. The mission of a union is foundationally *pro-democratic*. A unionized workplace is a democratic workplace. As in any democracy, workplace democracies can be led by bad or incompetent people.
9/
But, as with any democracy, the way you fix this is by swapping out the bad leaders for good ones - not by abolishing democracy and replacing it with an atomized society in which it's every worker for themself, bargaining with a boss who will always win a one-on-one fight in the long run.
I raise this because a general strike is back on the table, likely for May Day 2028 (5/1/28):
https://labornotes.org/2025/12/maybe-general-strike-isnt-so-impossible-now
10/
-
undefined filobus@sociale.network shared this topic
Feed RSS
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
@molly0xfff purr-dy
-
@IlSole24Ore @food-il-sole-24-ore-IlSole24Ore tanto il gusto medio non percepisce la differenza tra cibo surgelato e cibo no, e non sa più qual è il gusto del cibo fresco colto in giornata
-
No, non si fa arte con l’intelligenza artificiale. Si scava solo una grandissima fossa per tutti.
-
@lritter the one hitch I'm worried about is I'd like this to eventually work with steamdeck. proton defaults to some weird mouse emulation for touch screen events, and i haven't tested a native linux version on it yet. desktop mode is kde and probably wayland? no idea what the regular steam shell uses.
-
-
@lritter and i figure in the unlikely event that using mollytime with a touch screen on linux sees enough interest that wayland's defective "multitouch" protocol / the implementations thereof becomes a problem, I can put up a sign or something that explains who to contact about getting it fixed for each wayland desktop environment that implements it badly
-
@_elena @shollyethan @ilja @yunohost
about to give this a try! thanks!
-
@funcrunch aw! try https://www.mollywhite.net/feed/tag/ruthie then
