I think it's time for me to take one of the BSDs for a spin.
-
I think it's time for me to take one of the BSDs for a spin.
What's the hardware support situation like? Worse than Linux, or about the same, or about the same but slower?
-
I think it's time for me to take one of the BSDs for a spin.
What's the hardware support situation like? Worse than Linux, or about the same, or about the same but slower?
@ajroach42 I bet @peteorrall or @stefano might have an opinion on that. 😅
-
@ajroach42 I bet @peteorrall or @stefano might have an opinion on that. 😅
@SrRochardBunson @ajroach42 @stefano
The BSDs are *awesome* operating systems. #FreeBSD is a high performance general purpose OS. It is modern #Unix. #NetBSD is for portability, it supports nearly every CPU architecture under the sun. #OpenBSD is security-focused. #DragonflyBSD is a FreeBSD fork focused on the desktop.
Most of my experience is with FreeBSD, which I will enthusiastically share. It is unquestionably a solid server OS. As a desktop OS, it works quite well. It definitely does not feel like "Linux from 2004." The major desktop environments like #KDE #GNOME #XFCE are all supported and #nvidia releases drivers for the OS too. Modern hardware is supported. For *cutting edge hardware*, #Linux may be the better bet here. It's a little slower to adopt cutting edge gear because it is focused on stability and elegant solutions, not trend-chasing.
FreeBSD is an excellent OS to learn. It runs beautifully and it's more coherent and better designed. Documentation is *solid*.
-
undefined stefano@mastodon.bsd.cafe shared this topic
-
@SrRochardBunson @ajroach42 @stefano
The BSDs are *awesome* operating systems. #FreeBSD is a high performance general purpose OS. It is modern #Unix. #NetBSD is for portability, it supports nearly every CPU architecture under the sun. #OpenBSD is security-focused. #DragonflyBSD is a FreeBSD fork focused on the desktop.
Most of my experience is with FreeBSD, which I will enthusiastically share. It is unquestionably a solid server OS. As a desktop OS, it works quite well. It definitely does not feel like "Linux from 2004." The major desktop environments like #KDE #GNOME #XFCE are all supported and #nvidia releases drivers for the OS too. Modern hardware is supported. For *cutting edge hardware*, #Linux may be the better bet here. It's a little slower to adopt cutting edge gear because it is focused on stability and elegant solutions, not trend-chasing.
FreeBSD is an excellent OS to learn. It runs beautifully and it's more coherent and better designed. Documentation is *solid*.
@peteorrall @SrRochardBunson @ajroach42 well said, Pete. There's not much I could add. Note that the modern suspension to ram isn't currently supported, but they're working on it
-
@peteorrall @SrRochardBunson @ajroach42 well said, Pete. There's not much I could add. Note that the modern suspension to ram isn't currently supported, but they're working on it
-
@peteorrall @SrRochardBunson @ajroach42 well said, Pete. There's not much I could add. Note that the modern suspension to ram isn't currently supported, but they're working on it
@stefano @SrRochardBunson @ajroach42
I will add the #FreeBSD team has made *significant* efforts to improve the desktop experience, particularly on laptops. Each release just gets better.