[2018]
Uncategorized
27
Posts
11
Posters
37
Views
-
@xgranade @ireneista @emaytch @mcc "computer means number go up forever"
@jplebreton @xgranade @emaytch @mcc the singularity is the rapture for people who find computers easier to believe in than old men
-
[2018]
DUDES: We made a website where you can look up a charity and see what % of donations it spends on admin overhead
ME: Hey that rules
DUDES: It's called effective altruism
[2025]
OTHER DUDES: So those EA dudes want to pave all farmland on earth for the benefit of hypothetical robots 10,000,000,000,000 years in the future
ME: Wha
[DOES THIS STORY HAVE A MORAL? I CAN'T TELL.]
@mcc I once saw an EA person do a presentation and their shiny formula for the expected value of the future of humanity included terms for the star density both in the milky way as well as in the local virgo supercluster as a whole.
Absolute clown show of a movement.
-
@emaytch @mcc at the risk of almost assuredly being That Guy, actually maybe the hints were there in the original website …something something… disrespect for glue work …rambling segway to my own REAL pet peeve… how this timeline could have been so much better if we'd tracked % of donations sent back in the mail asking for more donations instead U+220E
@natevw @emaytch so there's a "soft problematic" version of EA where they get really really focused on dollars that go directly to services and this winds up over-funding things that accidentally game that number and de-funding important community work which due to the structural nature of its work means a slightly higher percentage gets spent on facilities or outreach
your city gets a lot of mosquito nets but no arts funding, in blunt terms
-
@xgranade @ireneista @emaytch @mcc "computer means number go up forever"
@jplebreton@mastodon.social @xgranade@wandering.shop @ireneista@adhd.irenes.space @emaytch@mastodon.social @mcc@mastodon.social I suddenly see a connection to one of Zeno's Paradoxes, as well, where when you build a seemingly logical construct of reality (to reach a location, you must first reach halfway between there and your starting point) and take it to the limit (infinitely many halved distances between you and the destination) you end up with results that seem sound (the harmonic series does not converge!) and yet are easily disproven just by looking at reality.
The scientific method applied here would suggest, "oh, your model is bad". But it's clear there was no applying that here. -
@jplebreton@mastodon.social @xgranade@wandering.shop @ireneista@adhd.irenes.space @emaytch@mastodon.social @mcc@mastodon.social I suddenly see a connection to one of Zeno's Paradoxes, as well, where when you build a seemingly logical construct of reality (to reach a location, you must first reach halfway between there and your starting point) and take it to the limit (infinitely many halved distances between you and the destination) you end up with results that seem sound (the harmonic series does not converge!) and yet are easily disproven just by looking at reality.
The scientific method applied here would suggest, "oh, your model is bad". But it's clear there was no applying that here.@aud @mcc @jplebreton @emaytch @ireneista There was a great article I read a while ago about how you can understand science as the transition from rationalism to empiricism. That is, that science is the idea that you need to actually check your logic against the real world. There are many logically consistent worlds which are not ours, so it doesn't matter what you derive in your own brain if you don't have a connection out to empirical observation.
Techbros could stand to take note.
-
@aud @mcc @jplebreton @emaytch @ireneista There was a great article I read a while ago about how you can understand science as the transition from rationalism to empiricism. That is, that science is the idea that you need to actually check your logic against the real world. There are many logically consistent worlds which are not ours, so it doesn't matter what you derive in your own brain if you don't have a connection out to empirical observation.
Techbros could stand to take note.
@xgranade @aud @mcc @jplebreton @emaytch and it's worth remembering that this radical position, that observation of reality is irrelevant and unimportant, is the thing that today's rationalist movement is actually named for. it's not actually about the practice of science, though we think many of its adherents don't fully appreciate that.
-
@xgranade @aud @mcc @jplebreton @emaytch and it's worth remembering that this radical position, that observation of reality is irrelevant and unimportant, is the thing that today's rationalist movement is actually named for. it's not actually about the practice of science, though we think many of its adherents don't fully appreciate that.
@xgranade @aud @mcc @jplebreton @emaytch (the thread is about effective altruism but in practice there's heavy overlap in those communities)
-
@natevw @emaytch so there's a "soft problematic" version of EA where they get really really focused on dollars that go directly to services and this winds up over-funding things that accidentally game that number and de-funding important community work which due to the structural nature of its work means a slightly higher percentage gets spent on facilities or outreach
your city gets a lot of mosquito nets but no arts funding, in blunt terms
-
@xgranade @aud @mcc @jplebreton @emaytch and it's worth remembering that this radical position, that observation of reality is irrelevant and unimportant, is the thing that today's rationalist movement is actually named for. it's not actually about the practice of science, though we think many of its adherents don't fully appreciate that.
@ireneista @aud @mcc @jplebreton @emaytch Yep. It's radical and also *deeply* reactionary. Notably, it's also a huge break from even the reactionary forms of New Atheism. At one point, Sam Harris of all people was arguing that empiricism was necessary to ethics, not just philosophy. Now the whole reactionary movement seems to have left even that behind.
-
@ireneista @emaytch @mcc It's the exact same fallacy as Pascal's Wager. Once you assign infinite cost or reward to a decision, any "empirical" or "rational" framework applied to that loss function absolutely shits the bed. The resolution, of course, is "why in the hell do you think that's a possible outcome? what is your basis for that belief?"
@xgranade @ireneista @emaytch @mcc ...but then you try to apply it to something like intercepting killer asteroids and they suddenly get all "well, let's be reasonable and practical." It's all just different forms of confirmation bias.
-
@xgranade @aud @mcc @jplebreton @emaytch (the thread is about effective altruism but in practice there's heavy overlap in those communities)
@ireneista @aud @mcc @jplebreton @emaytch Yeah, absolutely. I disagree about some of the specifics, but "TESCREAL" as a term to point to the intersection of all of those related but distinct philosophical schools is useful nonetheless.
-
@xgranade @ireneista @emaytch @mcc ...but then you try to apply it to something like intercepting killer asteroids and they suddenly get all "well, let's be reasonable and practical." It's all just different forms of confirmation bias.
@TomF @ireneista @emaytch @mcc I love how in e/acc and xrisk language, climate change is not "existential," only these pretend billion-year-future things.
-
Robert Anton Wilson, 1979: Any false premise, sufficiently extended, provides a reasonable approximation of insanity
2025: Any false premise, sufficiently extended, turns out to be an already-existing thread on something called "lesswrong dot com" and it turns out a cofounder of Paypal has already given it 10 million dollars
Quotes from Jeff Miller @jmeowmeow in a followers-only discussion I wanted to foreground:
"Runaway inflation in the philosophical flattery economy."
"As wealth and power is narrowly concentrated, the reward of flattery as a practice increases. If there's competition for flattery work as verbally charming people lose other opportunities for subsistence, there's motivation to go bigger and bigger."
-
@TomF @ireneista @emaytch @mcc I love how in e/acc and xrisk language, climate change is not "existential," only these pretend billion-year-future things.
@xgranade @TomF @ireneista @emaytch There's this idea from indigenous philosophy (the Haudenosaunee/Iroquois, I think? i found about it from uh, a cleaning products company) that you should do all things while considering its impact on people seven generations from now. I think that's a really good rule actually. That's a really reasonable timespan. I don't know if people exist in 10^10 years. I'm certain people exist in 7 generations, or at least, what we do now decides whether they exist.
-
@xgranade @TomF @ireneista @emaytch There's this idea from indigenous philosophy (the Haudenosaunee/Iroquois, I think? i found about it from uh, a cleaning products company) that you should do all things while considering its impact on people seven generations from now. I think that's a really good rule actually. That's a really reasonable timespan. I don't know if people exist in 10^10 years. I'm certain people exist in 7 generations, or at least, what we do now decides whether they exist.
@xgranade @TomF @ireneista @emaytch Notably, seven generations turns out to be right in the sweet spot for "work to hold back greenhouse emissions now results in benefits then".
-
@ireneista @emaytch @mcc It's the exact same fallacy as Pascal's Wager. Once you assign infinite cost or reward to a decision, any "empirical" or "rational" framework applied to that loss function absolutely shits the bed. The resolution, of course, is "why in the hell do you think that's a possible outcome? what is your basis for that belief?"
@xgranade @ireneista @emaytch @mcc as i like to say, i wouldn't say there's such a thing as reading too much science fiction…but there is such a thing as not reading enough stuff that isn't science fiction
-
@xgranade @ireneista @emaytch @mcc as i like to say, i wouldn't say there's such a thing as reading too much science fiction…but there is such a thing as not reading enough stuff that isn't science fiction
@nev @ireneista @emaytch @mcc Or at least, forgetting the "fiction" part of "science fiction." Fiction is a wonderful thing, but you still need critical reading skills!
-
undefined oblomov@sociale.network shared this topic on
-
@mcc I once saw an EA person do a presentation and their shiny formula for the expected value of the future of humanity included terms for the star density both in the milky way as well as in the local virgo supercluster as a whole.
Absolute clown show of a movement.
@lambdatotoro @mcc the fun thing is that they aren't even doing THAT right. As an example (and shameless plug) some time ago I did some back of the napkin calculations to check what energy requirements world be like if we didn't stop pushing for “growth at all costs”. Billions of years? Turns out that at current growth rates we'd exhaust the entire Milky Way in a couple thousand years even if we could convert it to energy at 100% efficiency.
-
@natevw @emaytch so there's a "soft problematic" version of EA where they get really really focused on dollars that go directly to services and this winds up over-funding things that accidentally game that number and de-funding important community work which due to the structural nature of its work means a slightly higher percentage gets spent on facilities or outreach
your city gets a lot of mosquito nets but no arts funding, in blunt terms
Feed RSS
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
@giuglionasi da ciò se ne evince una competenza profonda,direi a livello sub atom aehm... qual'è il numero atomico dello stronzioh?
-
Olimpiadi - Il presidente Fontana mostra come va indossato il casco da gara
#spinoza
-
-
@ballalloi @ed @Vi @oblomov c'è anche sshfs con cui puoi montare una directory di una macchina a cui hai accesso via ssh su una directory locale, e poi dovresti poterci scrivere con l'editor che vuoi
il comando è tipo ``sshfs macchina.remota:/path/della/directory/remota /path/della/directory/locale``
poi devi andare a confessarti per aver usato vscod(e|ium), ma lì sono fatti tra te e il tuo confessore e noi non vogliamo saperne :D
-
@oblomov @ballalloi comunque anche con vi il modo normale per incollare è selezionare con il mouse e poi fare click con il tasto centrale, e quello dovrebbe funzionare anche non nano
(con vi. come dio comanda. non con quell'abominio moderno di vim con il supporto per il mouse che fa casini :D )
-
After a lot of twists and turns, we finally landed in Doha.
-
@informapirata @lastknight@sociale.network @eticadigitale ma se genitori sono quei venti milioni di astenuti quale compito educativo possiamo suggerirgli?
-
Passa a Ghost! Substack conferma che la violazione dei dati colpisce gli indirizzi email e i numeri di telefono degli utenti
Substack ha confermato una violazione dei dati in un'e-mail agli utenti. L'azienda ha affermato che a ottobre una "terza parte non autorizzata" ha avuto accesso ai dati degli utenti, inclusi indirizzi e-mail, numeri di telefono e altri "metadati interni" non specificati.
