ok genuine crisis of faith here.
Uncategorized
12
Posts
8
Posters
0
Views
-
ok genuine crisis of faith here. I've got two games I've been working on, both are intended to be fully open source. One is nearly ready for a public release, the other is probably realistically a year or two out. I feel it is important for the source to be available for the former, and it might not yet be part of any training sets because it only has 17 stars on github, but I'm assuming it probably is already.
The latter is largely not online at all, because I simply haven't built it yet...
-
ok genuine crisis of faith here. I've got two games I've been working on, both are intended to be fully open source. One is nearly ready for a public release, the other is probably realistically a year or two out. I feel it is important for the source to be available for the former, and it might not yet be part of any training sets because it only has 17 stars on github, but I'm assuming it probably is already.
The latter is largely not online at all, because I simply haven't built it yet...
I was ambivalent about my code going into training sets, but now for a variety of exciting reasons I am no longer ambivalent. So here's the conflict: the only way I can think of to realistically prevent it from ever going into the plagiarism machine is to simply never make the source available. There we go. That's the crisis of faith.
-
I was ambivalent about my code going into training sets, but now for a variety of exciting reasons I am no longer ambivalent. So here's the conflict: the only way I can think of to realistically prevent it from ever going into the plagiarism machine is to simply never make the source available. There we go. That's the crisis of faith.
@aeva i hear you. i've been an open source contributor for decades and closed my github because i don't want to feed the machine, and it feels like a betrayal of my own principles but so does knowingly giving everything away to the slop hopper
-
I was ambivalent about my code going into training sets, but now for a variety of exciting reasons I am no longer ambivalent. So here's the conflict: the only way I can think of to realistically prevent it from ever going into the plagiarism machine is to simply never make the source available. There we go. That's the crisis of faith.
This is all possible because we had a healthy commons and so that's the reward for building a healthy commons: enclosure by billionaires who are promising the end of everyone's ability to make a living in a creative field. If that really will come to pass, we'd have been better off if we never shared anything on the internet and that really hurts.
-
This is all possible because we had a healthy commons and so that's the reward for building a healthy commons: enclosure by billionaires who are promising the end of everyone's ability to make a living in a creative field. If that really will come to pass, we'd have been better off if we never shared anything on the internet and that really hurts.
@aeva I really need to bookmark interesting posts more often. There was a post with a solution that sounds like a good place to start. Paraphrasing: "If you want access to the source, talk to me. Make the human connection."
-
This is all possible because we had a healthy commons and so that's the reward for building a healthy commons: enclosure by billionaires who are promising the end of everyone's ability to make a living in a creative field. If that really will come to pass, we'd have been better off if we never shared anything on the internet and that really hurts.
well, that.
Or we could do it like on the school yards some 30 years ago and exchange software – this time in the form of Git repositories – using physical media.
Bonus points for using ZIP-Disks, but US thumb drives are okay, too, I guess.
-
This is all possible because we had a healthy commons and so that's the reward for building a healthy commons: enclosure by billionaires who are promising the end of everyone's ability to make a living in a creative field. If that really will come to pass, we'd have been better off if we never shared anything on the internet and that really hurts.
@aeva I guess you could put it up encrypted and hand out keys but that doesn't prevent someone else from feeding it to the AI machine.
-
I was ambivalent about my code going into training sets, but now for a variety of exciting reasons I am no longer ambivalent. So here's the conflict: the only way I can think of to realistically prevent it from ever going into the plagiarism machine is to simply never make the source available. There we go. That's the crisis of faith.
@aeva I’ve been struggling with this too for my projects. I don’t have an answer. I’m sorry.
-
This is all possible because we had a healthy commons and so that's the reward for building a healthy commons: enclosure by billionaires who are promising the end of everyone's ability to make a living in a creative field. If that really will come to pass, we'd have been better off if we never shared anything on the internet and that really hurts.
@aeva yup
you can hide it from scrapers, but any healthy fork will be noticed and scraped eventually
-
@celestia problem is if the game ever got popular it's an inevitability that someone will put the source online
-
This is all possible because we had a healthy commons and so that's the reward for building a healthy commons: enclosure by billionaires who are promising the end of everyone's ability to make a living in a creative field. If that really will come to pass, we'd have been better off if we never shared anything on the internet and that really hurts.
right now my best answer is just... not open source anything. or at least, hang on to it for a few years, see what happens with this bubble. if it pops and takes down half the west coast tech industry, nothing was lost and source code can go online again. if it doesn't though, well, i guess go ask the god mommy machine to hallucinate an interactive video for you or something i'm sure it'll be just as good 🙄
-
right now my best answer is just... not open source anything. or at least, hang on to it for a few years, see what happens with this bubble. if it pops and takes down half the west coast tech industry, nothing was lost and source code can go online again. if it doesn't though, well, i guess go ask the god mommy machine to hallucinate an interactive video for you or something i'm sure it'll be just as good 🙄
@aeva I think “source available on good request” after a conf talk etc is often a good option. Not everything needs to be widely public, not anymore, but collaborative communities are vital.
-
undefined oblomov@sociale.network shared this topic
Feed RSS
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
@RolloTreadway Yes, it's been a lovely day overall.
-
@gilraen79 ❤️ 💙 😍 👍
Great shot 💙 @dogs
-
Didymos e Dimorphos fanno a “palle di roccia”
https://www.media.inaf.it/2026/03/11/trasporto-materiale-fra-asteroidi/
> I due asteroidi visitati – e colpiti – dalla missione Dart della Nasa si scambiano continuamente materiale roccioso, in una promiscuità che molto potrebbe dirci su come gli asteroidi evolvono nel tempo e su come possono minacciare il n
-
@SuperTaliaDX @eniko enicookies are essential
-
Occhiali ''smart'' di Meta: operatori vedono immagini intime degli utenti. (2)
Riprese effettuate di nascosto, donne molestate - Zeus News
https://www.zeusnews.it/n.php?c=31893
-
@eniko excuse me, you can't just give out non-essential cookies. that's a GDPR violation!
-
RE: https://hachyderm.io/@evacide/116207648749663738
I'm sure you have a massive pile of Avian Intelligence story ideas from everything happening but here's one that would fit in very well:
-
Occhiali "smart" di Meta: operatori vedono immagini intime degli utenti
P1 Leggi l'articolo originale su ZEUS News - https://www.zeusnews.it/n.php?c=31892
