Ars: we have retracted this article and will be enforcing editorial standards
-
Ars: we have retracted this article and will be enforcing editorial standards
Us: because your writer used AI?
Ars: Oh heavens no, because they used AI in a way that was so obvious, of course!
-
Ars: we have retracted this article and will be enforcing editorial standards
Us: because your writer used AI?
Ars: Oh heavens no, because they used AI in a way that was so obvious, of course!
@eniko@mastodon.gamedev.place not sorry, just embarrassed we got caught
-
Ars: we have retracted this article and will be enforcing editorial standards
Us: because your writer used AI?
Ars: Oh heavens no, because they used AI in a way that was so obvious, of course!
@eniko hm their statement says they only allow ai content for demonstration purposes. For now, anyway.
-
Ars: we have retracted this article and will be enforcing editorial standards
Us: because your writer used AI?
Ars: Oh heavens no, because they used AI in a way that was so obvious, of course!
Ars: "the AI retractions will continue until morale improves" 🤡
-
Ars: we have retracted this article and will be enforcing editorial standards
Us: because your writer used AI?
Ars: Oh heavens no, because they used AI in a way that was so obvious, of course!
@eniko us: what editorial standards?
ars: um, well, the ones this violated of course
-
Ars: we have retracted this article and will be enforcing editorial standards
Us: because your writer used AI?
Ars: Oh heavens no, because they used AI in a way that was so obvious, of course!
@eniko yeah the comments lauding the apology had me so confused. no mention of ramifications for the author clearly using it. sigh
-
undefined oblomov@sociale.network shared this topic on