@strypey@darius I think that's about right. Darius may have more details.
And we should probably be clear about the change in the AP spec. It will likely be iterative and backwards compatible. A lot of the work will be clarifying badly defined behavior, adding more and better examples, and so on. It's going to be evolutionary, not revolutionary.
@evan@maj So the third item should be "Anyone who are following both Alice and Bob" to be clear. Current form of the item (candidate) can be read "Anyone following whichever Alice or Bob, but not both" as I've confused.
@evan You asked "should", not "does", so my answer is "only people who follow *both* Alice and Bob", that is, the intersection of both sets of followers. (Your 3rd option, to me, reads like "people who follow *either*", that is, the union.)
Whether Alice-only follower Carol (resp. Bob-only follower Dave) should gain access to Bob's reply by following Bob (resp. Alice) after Bob's reply is unclear to me.
Zac (Yorkshire, UK) has been training very hard. He is looking to fill the goalkeeper position if GB ever stands up a National Cats Football Team.#cats #cat #CatNews #CatsOfMastodon https://cat-news.news/