@hfinyow we support both web and app, and yes, you can anon browse!
General Discussion
1
Posts
1
Posters
7
Views
-
@hfinyow we support both web and app, and yes, you can anon browse!
We even have public tags and an explore page!
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
@SimonTB @javahippie no fosdem for me unfortunately. Keep an eye out for the first commits. Still mulling over a testing strategy that is manageable and not too complex.
-
@tokyo_0 Whoever shows up and contributes. So you could!
-
@myfear @javahippie looks like what I've been wanting to build for a long time. Even similar tech stack (Java + Postgres). Guess it'll be hard to contribute as long as there's no existing code, right? But I'll keep an eye out for my chance to join #OpenPace :)
You guys don't happen to be at #FOSDEM to discuss about this project? Note: I'm not sure yet, if I can make it to FOSDEM this year.
-
@julian yes. BadgeFed has an API. But the concept is really simple, it is a Note (or Document) that has an attachment. The attachment is a property of the ActivityPub object usually used for videos or images. In this case the attachment includes a full OpenBadge object.
The only restriction is that the Note attributed (activitypub actor) MUST be the url in the OpenBadge issuer (issuer = actor). Also the recipient url from the OpenBadge SHOULD be mentioned in the Note.
With this simple mechanism you can pretty much create a compatible badge that can be decentralized with BadgeFed.
-
This needs integration with #GadgetBridge, of course
-
@mapache@hachyderm.io from what I understand you're using the ActivityPub note for compatibility. I wonder if a custom object type might open more doors.
Doesn't really matter, just thinking out loud 🙂
Does BadgeFed have an API to create new badges? Or fetch badges?
-
@julian absolutely, but I think I don't fully get it, could you elaborate?
-
@mapache@hachyderm.io I may consider building out a plugin for Badgefed.
Any chance you might consider using a new object type, e.g. Badge?
