I encourage everybody to adopt the following pattern, when talking about ActivtyPub:
General Discussion
6
Posts
3
Posters
14
Views
-
I encourage everybody to adopt the following pattern, when talking about ActivtyPub:
- Use W3C ActivityPub, when referring to The Specification and its consequences
- Use ActivityPub for referring to what is actually implemented in the Fediverse
If it's important what you mean by ActivityPub, use more clarifications, e.g. Mastodon-ActivityPub.
-
I encourage everybody to adopt the following pattern, when talking about ActivtyPub:
- Use W3C ActivityPub, when referring to The Specification and its consequences
- Use ActivityPub for referring to what is actually implemented in the Fediverse
If it's important what you mean by ActivityPub, use more clarifications, e.g. Mastodon-ActivityPub.
@helge for what is actually implemented in the fediverse i would use the term "fediverse", or with clarification "mastodon protocol". i don't think it serves well to muddy the waters between following the spec vs following what others have done (which are generally not the same).
-
@helge for what is actually implemented in the fediverse i would use the term "fediverse", or with clarification "mastodon protocol". i don't think it serves well to muddy the waters between following the spec vs following what others have done (which are generally not the same).
Bad idea. The Fediverse is already ambiguous enough. Suggesting using it to also mean a protocol just creates a mess.
-
Bad idea. The Fediverse is already ambiguous enough. Suggesting using it to also mean a protocol just creates a mess.
@helge there is no singular fediverse protocol and there cannot be. "fediverse" is a collective/umbrella term. the protocols are "mastodon protocol", "lemmy protocol", "funkwhale protocol", etc, and they partially overlap.
-
I encourage everybody to adopt the following pattern, when talking about ActivtyPub:
- Use W3C ActivityPub, when referring to The Specification and its consequences
- Use ActivityPub for referring to what is actually implemented in the Fediverse
If it's important what you mean by ActivityPub, use more clarifications, e.g. Mastodon-ActivityPub.
@helge I support this
-
@helge there is no singular fediverse protocol and there cannot be. "fediverse" is a collective/umbrella term. the protocols are "mastodon protocol", "lemmy protocol", "funkwhale protocol", etc, and they partially overlap.
test refederation
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
-
@tennoseremel it very well could have activitystrea.ms/specs/atom/1.0/
-
ActivityPub would have been better if it used XML instead of JSON.
/duck
-
@hongminhee noted! But maybe people need to see more fedi dev in non latin anyway to breac that anglophone hegemeny so maybe they should follow both!
-
@julian @flancian@anagora.org thank you Julian, nice to meet you and learn about [[NodeBB]] as well :)
https://nodebb.org/ looks cool!
-
@silverpill I have fixed this, I think, could you try again? :)
I'm testing a federation worker that will send new posts to followers periodically; I think it's working now so you should have received some posts from @flancian@anagora.org at mitra.social.
-
@flancian@social.coop @flancian@anagora.org confirming follow accept working from NodeBB as well.
Hello world!
-
>I was surprised to learn that many implementations don't ever poll the outbox, IIUC?
Yes, outbox polling is not widespread. Mastodon seems to do this, but not many others.
>Manually or with an automated suite?
Manually :)
