UnifiedPush has already been around for five years!
Uncategorized
4
Posts
3
Posters
17
Views
-
UnifiedPush has already been around for five years! Now is the perfect time to look back and forward.
-
UnifiedPush has already been around for five years! Now is the perfect time to look back and forward.
This post is deleted! -
undefined daniel@gultsch.social shared this topic on
-
This post is deleted!
@daniel It would be great to have it working with NextPush. Arne once explained why it doesn't do it for his Monocles client. But I forgot what he said. /o\
-
This post is deleted!
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
@eniatitova so in other words https://urusai.social/@sayonaraminasan/116071181282193656
-
@potatomeow@fosstodon.org the blog itself could be a Group, and your account as the Person.
That's one way you can set up a WordPress install.
-
@j12t@j12t.social I had a chance to read @ben@werd.social's position statement and it was so well written that it pretty much encapsulates everything I feel about how to grow the open social web 🙂
-
@thedarkknight257@mastodon.social it's simple, but it's so vague and underspecified in some places. But that's why there's a working group making it better 🙂
It excites me that I'm building software on the forefront of open social tech.
-
Ddl buongiorno: mobilitazione nazionale a livello territoriale domenica 15 febbraio. manifestazione nazionale a roma sabato 28 febbraio
@anarchia
Per contrastare il ddl Bongiorno nasce il collettivo ‘Consenso-scelta-libertà’ composto da Associazione Nazionale Volontarie del Telefono Rosa, Casa Internazionale
-
@Ryoma123 fumetti in spagnolo. Sui torrent è pieno.
-
l’IA sta falsando sondaggi e ricerche online?
-
I’m seeing people start to take interest in ICE subpoenas. They are understandably new to many of you. But I used to respond to subpoenas in my old job, and would occasionally receive an ICE subpoena.
The first time I got one, I remember thinking “huh. I didn’t realize DHS had an independent subpoena power.” So I went and looked up the enacting statute. *Like any lawyer in my position is supposed to do!*
and I figured out pretty quickly that the subpoenas requested information that was waaaaay beyond the scope of enacting statute which permits them to be used *only* to obtain information “relating to the privilege of any person to enter, reenter, reside in, or pass through the United States or concerning any matter which is material and relevant to the enforcement of this chapter.” 8 U.S. Code
1225(d). 1/
