An in-depth analysis of Mozilla's dystopian future.
-
An in-depth analysis of Mozilla's dystopian future.
Again we encounter the fundamental schism of purpose between Mozilla trying to survive, and the mission its core audience believes in.
-
An in-depth analysis of Mozilla's dystopian future.
Again we encounter the fundamental schism of purpose between Mozilla trying to survive, and the mission its core audience believes in.
@amoroso
I can't help but agree with their conclusion: Let Mozilla die; it's no longer fit for purpose. -
@amoroso
I can't help but agree with their conclusion: Let Mozilla die; it's no longer fit for purpose. -
An in-depth analysis of Mozilla's dystopian future.
Again we encounter the fundamental schism of purpose between Mozilla trying to survive, and the mission its core audience believes in.
@amoroso recently I became resigned to the idea that it’s less important for us to have a non-WebKit-origin browser engine for browser diversity, and it’s good enough for us to have a non-Blink engine (that is, WebKit itself). As much as I opposed Apple only allowing WebKit on iOS, it has resulted in a bulwark against a Chrome monopoly, so that’s something
-
@amoroso recently I became resigned to the idea that it’s less important for us to have a non-WebKit-origin browser engine for browser diversity, and it’s good enough for us to have a non-Blink engine (that is, WebKit itself). As much as I opposed Apple only allowing WebKit on iOS, it has resulted in a bulwark against a Chrome monopoly, so that’s something
@macinjosh We probably deserve a bit more.
-
@macinjosh We probably deserve a bit more.
@amoroso yeah. I actually almost said “it’s not the browser diversity we deserve, but it’s the browser diversity we need right now”