I saw a recent discussion at work on how to approach code style for data attributes in #HTML
Uncategorized
4
Posts
3
Posters
6
Views
-
I saw a recent discussion at work on how to approach code style for data attributes in #HTML
When you want to use them as boolean, do you set the string "true" or leave it empty and check for the attribute existence?
-
I saw a recent discussion at work on how to approach code style for data attributes in #HTML
When you want to use them as boolean, do you set the string "true" or leave it empty and check for the attribute existence?
@dev by the specs, which drives the browser parser
Boolean properties are true when present, false when absent. They are also false when present with empty string. If they are true and should be XML valid they have the value of the name of the property as string.
`<input disabled=“disabled”> //false`
Data are always string, not a Bool, so when used needs to have a value, otherwise it will be “falsy” to JS (empty string)
-
I saw a recent discussion at work on how to approach code style for data attributes in #HTML
When you want to use them as boolean, do you set the string "true" or leave it empty and check for the attribute existence?
@dev My understanding is that for boolean attributes (e.g. checked on checkboxes) the HTML convention is attribute="attribute" if ones to fill in the value, otherwise just the empty string is fine.
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Glossary/Boolean/HTML
-
@dev My understanding is that for boolean attributes (e.g. checked on checkboxes) the HTML convention is attribute="attribute" if ones to fill in the value, otherwise just the empty string is fine.
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Glossary/Boolean/HTML
@oblomov When using `checked` or `hidden` I do like not to add any value.
```
<input type="checkbox" checked />
```Here's an interesting take with link to the HTML spec:
-
undefined oblomov@sociale.network shared this topic on
Feed RSS
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
Aveva aspettato molto per salutarla
-
@angel we definitely do. I'm lucky enough to be able to go and see it from time to time (even if last time has been in August). So the next time I'll watch the sea, I'll dedicate it to you. Meanwhile, I'm sending you this photo, from November 2024
-
Thank you so much, Stefano. I know you and me also share The Sea as a lover, but we are reasonable and generous lovers.
-
@angel beautiful words!
-
@yura
Thanks
@femcessoctt
-
I'm in love with The Sea. It's a bit strange, as I'm from Madrid; it's a dry and stubborn land as far from the sea as can be. Or, who knows, maybe that's the reason of my love, the love of the dispossesed, the love of the forsaken, the love of the abandoned; a loved one, a desired one, as far as can be. I wish I was by the shore, my sight lost in the flat horizon, my feet cold and wet, the engine of the sea drumming and roaring. I'm far away, but I'm reading Oceano mare by Alessandro Baricco and I see that we share The Sea as a lover, and reading his words (an art of words I will never be able to craft) I feel a bit better, a bit closer.
Those of you near The Sea, you'll know that I envy you. Please, give my regards to the one I love, I will be there, who knows when.
-
@6al quanto sei ottimista che pensi che le persone normali siano empatiche e solidali, quando invece sono molte di queste "persone normali" che sostengono e votano i dittatori o i partiti nazi-fascisti e populisti. Che sono a favore dei centri di concentramento in Albania, che gioiscono per i morti nel Mediterraneo.
O che sostengono e difendono i miliardari come Musk, Besos e il tizio di Meta.
P.S. bello risentirti, mio splendore.
E, con ritardo, buon Natale 🎄🎄🎄
-
Avete scassato il cazzo coi vostri cristi e mica cristi. Ma anche Checco Zalone non scherza.
