Vendo ipad usato ma perfettamente funzionante.
Uncategorized
2
Posts
2
Posters
11
Views
-
Vendo ipad usato ma perfettamente funzionante. Per info scrivetemi. Se mi ripubblicate fate una cortesia. Grazie.
-
Vendo ipad usato ma perfettamente funzionante. Per info scrivetemi. Se mi ripubblicate fate una cortesia. Grazie.
@glitch Un post di social media per la vendita di un iPad Air 2, con testo e immagini del dispositivo. In alto si presenta una barra del telefono con "lliad 20:52" e icone (allarme, Wi-Fi, VoLTE, 46% batteria). Sotto, il testo recita "VENDO IPAD" (verde), "Apple iPad. modello Air 2" (grigio), accanto a una foto di un iPad Air 2 in una custodia verde che mostra uno schermo con un lucchetto colorato (tempo 20:34). Sotto, quattro stelle verdi elencano le caratteristiche: "64 GB di archiviazione", "Perfettamente funzionante", "Completo di cavo di ricarica", "Ottimo per navigare, studiare e per il tempo libero", con "Scrivete mi x info" (verde). Una schermata parziale di impostazioni di iPad mostra i dettagli dello spazio di archiviazione (ad esempio, "Capienza 64 GB").
Fornito da @altbot, generato localmente e privatamente utilizzando Qwen3-Vl:30b
š± Energia utilizzata: 0.172 Wh
-
undefined max@poliverso.org shared this topic on
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
@soph Interesting: do you have a citation for vibe-code failing legal checks? No issue if you don't, I can hop on Google and find it, but this would be the first I'd heard of it (most of what I've heard is that LLM output is uncopyrightable, not that it violates someone else's copyright).
The reason I ask is that I'm aware of corporate contexts where it's being used and if the courts are leaning towards declaring them copyright violations that could have significant implications (declaring them non-copyrightable probably less so; in practice most companies protect source code as trade-secret because it's hard to prove provenance in a court-of-law... Or by moving so fast that a competitor exfiltrating an out-of-date chunk of source isn't super useful or would require the competitor to also have the hardware / architecture the code "lives" in).
-
I'd contest that this is not clear, either. If it can be shown that something an LLM created has clear lineage back to a copyrighted work, then we have a clear breach of the original license.
This needs to be the case to support the original license and the spirit of that license. Tools that are just doing a glorified copy/paste are violating those original licenses.
-
@HailsandAles lol
-
Sorry, I guess I don't quite understand how you're making this distinction? If gcc produces a bug, I don't actually know how to fix gcc to make it stop producing that bug? Or is that not what you meant?
Or are you trying to say that one category of tools is deterministic and the other is not? Because that's true; but arguably also kind of the point.
-
Chronic Illness Humor (@chronicillness.bsky.social)
https://bsky.app/profile/chronicillness.bsky.social/post/3mgssks2mfk2c
> Artist: @jennscomics
-
@PierricD @soph if it was heavily vibe-coded, then the non-vibe-coded pars could be released under public domain, but the vibe-coded parts (if i understand the court rulings correctly) never belonged to anyone in the first place.
It's as if every LLM releases each "work" that it produces into public domain, at the exact microsecond that it emits that "work".
-
Oddly enough, the people who can't be bothered to write their own code ALSO can't be bothered to grapple with the responsibilities and legal repercussions of their actions.
Go fig.
-
@stu 173 REPLIES... not counting favorites or boosts... almost getting to the end of my list now š
