Spicy take: git didn’t win because it’s good.
Uncategorized
2
Posts
2
Posters
4
Views
-
Spicy take: git didn’t win because it’s good. It’s not.
Git won because Linux used it, and you can rebase and force push.
Also. Everything else was fragile, a performance nightmare, or both.
It won for being “good enough.”
-
undefined oblomov@sociale.network shared this topic on
-
Spicy take: git didn’t win because it’s good. It’s not.
Git won because Linux used it, and you can rebase and force push.
Also. Everything else was fragile, a performance nightmare, or both.
It won for being “good enough.”
@Elizafox git has improved. i remember the days when you had to use a different frontend entirely, called cogito.
this is why atheme used mercurial for so long.
Gli ultimi otto messaggi ricevuti dalla Federazione
-
vedo l'anteprima, ma il player non dà suono. Mi capita spesso, credo sia un problema da questo lato.
-
-
@repubblica @politica-la-repubblica-repubblica dimissioni si ma di salvinì!
-
@jawarajabbi @ldmay65 @causticmsngo @jzillw @cstross
And, we presume, have substantial vested interest in not collapsing....
-
Smart working, dipendente si fa male in casa sua a Padova. Riconosciuto l’infortunio sul lavoro....toghe rosse l'ha già detto quella che non ha mai lavorato?
-
@dummzeuch @jawarajabbi @jzillw @cstross The important term is "assisted". And boy, assistance we need with that...
I'm not involved in the project in my company, we are doing exactly that refactoring (though not LLM-assisted) - and in parts actually develop new systems to replace the old one.
-
@VanityFairItaly @people-celebrities-VanityFairItaly morti sul lavoro tra i cantanti e orchestrali non se ne contano.... e luigi Tenco non conta!
